index_lms.html VS index_lms_html5.html
Jul 28, 2013
I want my LMS (SCORM Cloud) to only show users the HTML5 version of my course, regardless if Flash is installed. Since that doesn't seem to be an SL option, I've edited the imsmanifest.xml file to point directly to "index_lms_html5.html" instead of "index_lms.html" and the results seem to be good BUT should I expect any issues with this manual edit in terms of reporting, tracking, etc? Is there something in the "index_lms.html" that has to load that I'm not aware of or am I good with this override? Please advise.
10 Replies
Hi Jason,
I'm a bit outside my expertise here, but having your LMS point to the HTML5 version of the course shouldn't impact anything. I seem to recall others doing this same thing without any ill effects. If you find out otherwise though, please let us know!
Mike
Thanks for the reply, Mike. How confident are you of your answer and is there any way to get verification from the programmers on this? I apologize for sounding like I'm questioning you, I just don't want to launch this course for the client and have it blow up on me. Thanks again! =)
Good Afternoon, Jason.
I see no problem with this approach. One of the primary functions of index_lms.html is to kick the learner to index_lms_html5.html if the learner is using an iPad or other non-Flash compatible browser.
Having said that, I'd be remiss if I failed to state that Articulate cannot support the modification of published output, and that you should plan to test like crazy before going live.
Please let us know if you need anything else, and have a great day!
Hi - Piggybacking on this thread - Could we point it instead to index_html5.html? I'm wondering what the difference between index_lms_html5.html and index_heml5.html is?
The reason being, when I changed the link to index_lms_html5.html, I noticed a delay in the loading of the course. It took a good 30 seconds to load, but with the previous link (index_lms.html), it would load instantly. It also loads promptly when pointed to index_html5.html. But I don't know what the difference is between the filename with lms and the one without. Does anyone know? Cornerstone is my LMS. TIA!
Hi Archana,
The course links that end in _html5.html vs. _lms.html are the HTML5 vs. Flash output. We'd always recommend pointing to the index_lms.html file for LMS content and then Storyline will determine if it should show Flash or HTML5 based on the browser the user is accessing it through and if Flash is installed.
Hi Jason
Are you able to share what code you need to edit so that this takes place ? :
I've edited the imsmanifest.xml file to point directly to "index_lms_html5.html" instead of "index_lms.html"
I'm also just wondering why you would want to do this ? Doesnt the programme default to HTML5 if flash isnt present ?
Hi, Ashley.
I understood that pointing to the launch file is something that happens on the LMS side/changing the manifest. We've got some some confusion about whether there is a setting we choose within Articulate before publishing that handles this. Please advise. Also, if we don't launch in a new window, will we still see problems with browsers accepting an exit trigger? Or has that been resolved?
Thanks so much!
Hi Deb!
I'm happy to help! If your LMS requires you to identify the file that launches your course, we recommend pointing to index_lms.html for SCORM/AICC content or story.html for Tin Can API content.
You shouldn't have any issues using the Exit Course trigger in a browser. Would you mind explaining what happens with the Exit Course trigger?
If you wouldn't mind sharing your file, here's a private upload link so that we can take a look at the course!
How can I tell if older published files are HTML5 compliant?
Hi Jude,
How can I tell if older published files are HTML5 compliant?
That's a great question. First, it will depend on which publish format option was selected:
In Storyline 360 Updates 34 and earlier, the published output always included
_flash
and/or_html5
files.story.html
,story_flash.html
in the published outputstory.html
,story_html5.html
story.html
,story_html5.html
,story_flash.html
In Updates 35 and later, the published output only includes the
_flash
and/or_html5
files when both HTML5 and Flash formats are selected.Let me know if any more thoughts pop up. We're also happy to take a look at any files in question!
This discussion is closed. You can start a new discussion or contact Articulate Support.