Version difference -- index_lms.html vs. story.html for tincan
Mar 22, 2021
I have seen some posts on this, but nothing quite reflects what I have seen:
I was using Storyline 3 version 3.6.18134.0, always publishing for Tin Can, and I recently started getting messages about needing Flash, etc. I realized that I had a pretty old version, so I upgraded to 3.11.23355.0. The old version always defaulted to story.html for the launch url on the LMS Reporting screen. The new version defaults to index_lms.html.
We go to our database to determine where the file should be, and it took me a while to realize what was going on and why nothing was being tracked.
So I changed the launch url to be story.html (so I wouldn't have to change the database records), figuring that would fix things, but it did not. The published output is the same, and it seems like putting story.html in the launch url made no difference. The only way I can get this to work is to change our database to point to index_lms.html
This in itself is not that big a deal, except that I will now have to remember to change old database entries when a story is updated. My main question goes to understanding what is going on. Why does the launch url make no difference? Why must I now point to index_lms.html no matter what?
Thanks
2 Replies
Hi Frank!
In the October 2020 update for Storyline 3, we added a new launch file to Tin Can API (xAPI) courses so you can view them on your local computer before you upload them to your LMS.
In past versions for Storyline 3, publishing for TinCan only had one launch file
story.html
.The latest updates bring Tin Can API in line with the other LMS standards. You can view published courses on your local computer using
story.html
or by clicking View Project on the Publish Successful dialog. And your LMS usesindex_lms.html
to launch courses.If you have additional questions, don't hesitate to reach out to our team in a support case.
Thanks. That answers my question perfectly. Pointing to index_lms.html is the way go to now.