Security and confidentiality questions about Review

Jun 12, 2017

Hello,

To work with different colleagues on a storyline project, I thought using Review, in order to ease the collaboration work between.

But the project is very confidential and I have to garantee to the client that the content won't be available somewhere on Internet.

So I was wondering how review is working in terms of security and confidentiality: Where are stored the files? Is it the cloud? Who can access the project? How is it secured? When we delete the project from Review, is it also deleted from the servers?

Thank you for all the details you could bring on the question.

Jessica

14 Replies
Irina Poloubessov

Dear Jessica,

I was exactly going to ask the same question :) Would you be so kind to paste here a reply from the support engineer  when you know it? I would be very grateful.

I also had a short training in Articulate and there ,if I am not wrong and understood correctly, we were told that Review as not as secure as storing courses like Rise, etc.!

Hope there is a solution for secure collaboration.

Jessica Gayraud

Hello Irina,

Unfortunately I have no answer from the support. But, what I have understood from the page https://articulate.com/trust is that Articulate should ensure the confidentiallity and security, in every spaces on the cloud, Review included. Moreover, to ensure a higher security, I will use the password option.

Of course, if I have an answer, I share!

 

Jessica Gayraud

Hello all,

Here is the answer of the support:

"Articulate 360 is a multi-tenant architecture - so all clients share a database and fileshare. Files are kept separate by association to the users Articulate ID (linked to a UID in the database) - The UID will subscribe, be assigned to a team seat.

The Trust Center article referenced earlier ( https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__articulate.com_trust-23vendor-2Drisk-2Dmanagement-2Dprogram&d=DwIFAw&c=cxWN2QSDopt5SklNfbjIjg&r=I-3ETDM1W2wvUqhK27Twz0eGKVC04PkxtOFKkX-TknY&m=fN56fRQCsQV8mJQIEUHazcVSzExUCk9sa2TMgBAEFgM&s=a4Lx1UOtbAQicT9tu-px8Mz4T_4UH0nz9tyU9NyPwEc&e= ) talks about this and links to the security information provided by our third-party providers."

I hope it helps you too.

 

Irina Poloubessov

Dear Crystal,

As Jessica kindly has shared her answer, I have a question on the "Files are kept separate by association to the users Articulate ID":

Our clients would like that the links to the shared courses and the files , which are included as a downloadables, will have a meaningful filename. Currently, even if I upload a file with a meaningful name - after a client downloads it, it has a prefix like "AWERurewiWR". Similar with course links.

If our files are kept separate by users ID, could it be possible to keep our original filenames? I assume that files are hosted on your servers in subfolders structure, where their names cannot interfere with other users file names.

I submitted it as a feature request, but I wonder if it is planned to implement at all, so I can give a feedback to our clients.

Many thanks!

Crystal Horn

Hey Irina!

I have a workaround for you regarding the Rise sharing links.  The Rise share URL is meant for light sharing, but you can also export your course for web or LMS.

If you are hosting your content on your web server, you could always create a directory with the course name so that your link to share the course might look something like this:

http://yourserver.com/CourseName/index.html  

In fact, if your server is configured properly, it will tell the browser that index.html is the default filename to open in every folder, so the URL would look even nicer as

http://yourserver.com/CourseName   (no index.html needed).

I can't guarantee that you'll have that level of control over the URL you'd get from an LMS, were you to host your course there.

Anyway, I saw your feature request come through, so thanks for the ideas!

This discussion is closed. You can start a new discussion or contact Articulate Support.