Forum Discussion
Localization News!
Steve_Reynolds I don't think they can make this standard, as the cost is based on volume. You'd therefore be asking users who don't use the service, to pay for others using the service. I'm not 100% sure on this, but I'd say they would be using a third party service to complete the translation and is therefore an added cost. I think it's just to hard for them to bundle as a single cost. As I said, people would be paying for it in their 360 subscription, that don't use it.
Its not about the translations, as I mentioned I dont need that functionality I have in-house translators and free AI options that do as good a job if not better. The ability to have a single scene containing these different language versions is something I believe should not be a paid extra and is a great feature for those of us that do multiple language versions, if you want the in-built AI translations then sure I would expect to pay for that but in my case I dont. This single scene functionality is great but should be included as part on the standard subscription.
- SamHill4 months agoSuper Hero
Aha, I'm with you.
- AndreasMetzmann4 months agoCommunity Member
Hi Steve, I fully agree with you. We are doing a lot of localizations and the new language variables/conditions are not available without doing a full text translation through articulate. Also I was a bit shocked that currently the AI generated audios are not translated and regenerated - this means an extra layer of manual work even if we would pay. From a customer perspective I would love to purchase the license with the software functionality from articulate and pay my API costs (for cloud based AI Services) to deepl etc. directly.
Related Content
- 11 months ago
- 6 months ago