Blog Post
HarryCarter
5 years agoCommunity Member
I guess what I'm saying is that there's a whole lot of scrolling to see the titles...versus what I've attached. This is one of the reasons why I had previously posted (elsewhere) about having sub sections of sections.
At this point in time, we seem to be at a juncture of trying to make a new thing work as good as something that already worked perfectly. I am especially interested in this particular exercise because just the other day I went back to get what I'm attaching...a glossary that I need.
At this point in time I think the Engage glossary is superior as far as getting from A to B.
Oops...seems that I can't add an attachment. It was a glossary from Engage.
Regards,
Harry Carter
At this point in time, we seem to be at a juncture of trying to make a new thing work as good as something that already worked perfectly. I am especially interested in this particular exercise because just the other day I went back to get what I'm attaching...a glossary that I need.
At this point in time I think the Engage glossary is superior as far as getting from A to B.
Oops...seems that I can't add an attachment. It was a glossary from Engage.
Regards,
Harry Carter
- jeff5 years agoCommunity Member
- TrinaRimmer5 years agoFormer StaffHi again, Harry. I'm so glad you're finding the Engage Glossary so useful. That horizontal layout is nice for minimizing scrolling. But I think some folks might appreciate this concept, too. Sorry, it's not a good fit for your needs!
- HarryCarter5 years agoCommunity MemberTrina,
I think what it comes down to is...
If it could do what pretty much every other contact/glossary list on earth could do...then it would be a winner for us. The ability to have sub directories (which a number of us have asked for) and also, the ability to search...would allow the concept to rival what is already proven to be good.
Push those things!
Regards,
Harry Carter