Example
The Conversation Audit: Navigating Difficult Discussions
Ever had to tell a clinician their coding is a little generous? Push back on a peer who flagged your work? Escalate something to your boss when you're only 65% sure you're not crazy?
The setup: Three workplace conversations, three approaches to choose from (Direct, Diplomatic, or "well that escalated quickly"). You predict what'll happen before you pick — because nothing humbles you faster than being confidently wrong about your own communication skills.
Then things get uncomfortable (in a good way):
- Watch your chosen approach play out with a real character reaction
- See the fallout on a live dashboard — Relationship Health, Resolution Speed, Trust Built (spoiler: "Defensive + Emotional" tanks all three, shocking absolutely no one)
- Reflect on whether your prediction and your ego survived contact with reality
- Get the real talk from a guide debrief before moving on
Built in Rise 360 + custom HTML/CSS/JS, with Claude as my co-pilot. 🤖
No judgment if you pick the emotional/authoritative option just to see Patricia's face. I did too. For research purposes.
2 Replies
SMcNicol I really like the interactions, particularly the branching paths with outcomes. Everything is clear and easy to read without overload.
One thing I would fix in your code is to ensure when the learner clicks to move to the next page/slide that the viewport scrolls to the top. Currently it remains in the scroll position of the previous page; so the learner has to scroll up to view the content. There are several ways to achieve this depending on how your code is written so maybe Claude can help with that if you're not sure!
Good eye! You caught a real one — the scroll position was only resetting inside a content container, not the actual page, so learners were stuck wherever they left off on the previous slide. That's fixed now — every slide change brings them right back to the top. Thanks for taking the time to leave detailed feedback, it really helps! 😊
