Forum Discussion

DanThornton's avatar
DanThornton
Community Member
26 days ago

Rise Course xAPI File Structure Change??

I'm creating courses in Rise 360 and publishing in xAPI (TinCan). The published xAPI file structure from 3 days ago is completely different to the file structure when republishing the same course tod...
rise 360
ittaq's avatar
ittaq
Community Member
19 days ago

UPDATE

Support reached out to me and told me that they will revert to the id usage for xAPI in the next update! 🥳

 

Old Message

Hey guys,

We are wondering why the statements do not use the proper ids anymore. All the ids are still defined in the tincan.xml. Instead of using them, the statements use parsed names of the activities and replaces blanks with underscores. Additionally, there is other regex magic included. Why is the usage of the ids replaced by that unprecise strategy?

 

new statement: Why are they parsing the names instead of using the ids? The ids are still there in the tincan.xmlold statement: The statement refers to the ids given in the tincan.xml

I reached out to support and included these images and questions. All I got was the exact same message posted by DanThornton​.

  • BenjiBenjington's avatar
    BenjiBenjington
    Community Member
    17 days ago

    Hi ittaq,

    You can find everything you need to convert your post-December 2025 release into a format that older/custom LMSes will both accept and track xAPI statements. This also works in SCORM Cloud.

    https://github.com/ijnebzor/rise360-xapi-legacy-converter

    Feel free to download, fork and use as you see fit. 

    ⚠️ Disclaimer

    • This is not an official tool.
    • It is not supported or endorsed by Articulate.
    • It is provided as-is, without guarantee.
    • Use at your own discretion and responsibility.
    • It was created to solve our organisation's needs and is shared publicly in case it helps others.


    If this solves your problem, amazing. If not, feel free to fork, modify, and improve.