Forum Discussion
Seeking Feedback on My First Storyline 360 Module
Greetings, everyone!
After twenty years as a classroom educator, I'm transitioning into instructional design and learning experience design.
I've spent the last four months teaching myself Articulate Storyline 360 while developing my first complete eLearning module, Productive Feedback.
The module is designed for charge nurses and introduces a simple, three-element model for providing specific, focused feedback to their staff.
I've recently completed the first version and am beginning Alpha testing. I'd greatly appreciate feedback from fellow designers, particularly regarding the clarity of the content, learner experience, navigation, and overall instructional design.
I'm especially interested in constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement as I continue refining the module for my portfolio.
Review 360 link:
https://360.articulate.com/review/content/9a37fa9c-6c32-4352-b0ba-884450b7ff5d/review
Thank you so much for taking the time to look at my work. I truly appreciate any insights you're willing to share.
Take good care!
-Kyle
Hi Kyle, I went through the module. The information is beautifully chunked, and the progression of the activities is a real strength. You start with a manageable task and gradually increase the challenge, giving learners a foundation to build on as they move into more demanding interactions.
The main adjustment I’d suggest is reducing the on-screen motion. As I started reading one sentence, another sentence or animated element appeared and pulled my attention away. That repeated interruption made it harder to follow the explanation, even though the content itself was well organized. The animation adds extraneous cognitive load because the learner has to keep redirecting attention while processing the information.
I’d keep the progressive structure but let each complete thought settle before introducing another element. Present related text together, allow enough time to read it, and reserve motion for moments when it clarifies a relationship or directs attention to something essential. That would give your strong instructional design more room to work.
7 Replies
(And thanks so much for adding an image to my post. I love it!)
The help and advice I have received here has been so valuable and appreciated. I am now in the process of developing my Beta version with most of the text animations removed or adjusted. I realized that in my attempts to adhere to 'consistency' within my module, I got a little too carried away with the text wrap. Again, such great feedback from the UX perspective. A million thanks, Katie!
-Kyle
So cool to see you jump right in and share an example KBurch! Heads up, I added an image to your post. Feel free to adjust it to a different one if you'd like.
I see you've already gotten some great feedback, and I agree with agenovese's notes on text animations. Overall, I really liked the approach and how you had the learner give feedback up front, then revisit that to revise their feedback based on what they learned!
This has been so invaluable. Thanks so much!!
-Kyle
agenovese,
I can't thank you enough for not only taking the time to review my module, but to also give me such thoughtful feedback! Wow. Very good advice. One last question, if you have the time: Do you recommend removing all of the text wrap animation in the module, or just to use it less often and more strategically? Again, I truly thank you for the taking the time to help. Take good care.
-Kyle
Kyle, I'd lean toward removing most of the text animations unless they serve a clear instructional purpose. Timed animations assume everyone reads and processes information at the same pace, which can interfere with learning. It can also be a WCAG no-no if animations play automatically without giving learners control.
A well place graphic or text animation can be excellent for emphasis, but it generally works best when it stands on its own. From a cognitive load perspective less is often more. I'd reserve motion for moments when it genuinely adds meaning or directs attention to something important, rather than using it throughout the module. Your title and lesson pages are good examples of this.
Hi Kyle, I went through the module. The information is beautifully chunked, and the progression of the activities is a real strength. You start with a manageable task and gradually increase the challenge, giving learners a foundation to build on as they move into more demanding interactions.
The main adjustment I’d suggest is reducing the on-screen motion. As I started reading one sentence, another sentence or animated element appeared and pulled my attention away. That repeated interruption made it harder to follow the explanation, even though the content itself was well organized. The animation adds extraneous cognitive load because the learner has to keep redirecting attention while processing the information.
I’d keep the progressive structure but let each complete thought settle before introducing another element. Present related text together, allow enough time to read it, and reserve motion for moments when it clarifies a relationship or directs attention to something essential. That would give your strong instructional design more room to work.
