Blog Post

Articles
2 MIN READ

Proof There’s Always More Than One Way to Present Course Content

CommunityTeam's avatar
4 years ago

One of the most common questions we hear from e-learning pros is What’s the best way to present my content? The short answer is, it depends! As long as you’re keeping your learners’ needs in mind, there’s no right or wrong way to go about it.

To prove our point, we decided to give the same source content to three different instructional designers (IDs)—our very own Customer Engagement Managers Allison LaMotte, Madison McCartney, and Sarah Hodge—to see what they’d come up with. 

Here’s the source content we gave them:

Then we sent them to work with only one instruction—no peeking at each other’s work! 

Now that we’ve set the scene, let’s look at each designer’s project.

1. Immersive Scenario

Allison took an immersive approach by creating a scenario that closely resembles a real-life situation where learners would  need to prioritize tasks. They’d have to look around their desk to identify and analyze the tasks on their to-do list and determine whether they’re urgent and/or important. From there, learners must decide whether to do each task today, schedule it for later, delegate it, or take it off their to-do list.

View Example | Learn More | Download Template

2. Interactive Dials

Madison’s version breaks down the concepts of “important” and “urgent” into more manageable chunks, allowing learners to focus on each concept individually before pulling the entire matrix together. She does this using a series of interactive dials that put learners in the driver’s seat and encourage them to engage with the content.

View Example | Learn More | Download Template

3. Personalized Decision Matrix

Sarah’s take on the Eisenhower Decision Matrix gives learners a chance to apply the concepts on the spot by inviting them to fill out the matrix with the tasks on their to-do list. Once they’re done, they can print out their personalized task matrix—thanks to some JavaScript magic—and use it to boost their productivity. So handy!

View Example | Learn More | Download Template

More Resources

So what do you think? Do you see how each approach could benefit different learner needs?

Hopefully these examples free you from the notion that there’s only one “right” way to build a course and empower you to follow your instructional design instincts. 

Looking for more pro tips on designing engaging courses? Dive into these helpful articles:

And remember to follow us on Twitter and come back to E-Learning Heroes regularly for more helpful advice on everything related to e-learning. If you have any questions, please share them in the comments.

Published 4 years ago
Version 1.0
  • FadyMezrani's avatar
    FadyMezrani
    Community Member
    You could use all 3, starting with:

    1) Madison's to introduce concepts (Absorb-type)
    2) Allison's to practise and get immediate feedback (Do-type)
    3) Sarah's to extend and personalise it (Connect-type)

    Thanks to all 3 for sharing.
    • LonaRobertson-7's avatar
      LonaRobertson-7
      Community Member
      I observed the same thing, Fady. Although the content is the same, the three modules are actually based on different learning objectives that build on one another. A million years ago when I started teaching, I was told that my lesson plans should guide learners through four stages: "touch-build-practice-use." (I've since learned that there are alternatives to that approach, but that is another discussion.) The three modules here do exactly that and actually create a mini-course.
      • FadyMezrani's avatar
        FadyMezrani
        Community Member
        They do indeed, Lona. Perhaps the lesson here is that it takes more than one designer to create a thorough course, with each bringing a different perspective.
    • KarthickRichard's avatar
      KarthickRichard
      Community Member
      Kinda the same thought that was running in my head. I was just thinking it was a great example of how you could use multiple approaches in a course to tackle different objectives. :)
  • So great to see the different design concepts used on the same content. Thank you for sharing!