Forum Discussion
Custom block not displaying in LMS
- 5 months ago
Weird update... I started working through your recommendation's when it occurred to me that I was working in a really OLD rise course and adding the new blocks. I built a new course from scratch and the new beta blocks work fine in our LMS.
The issue only seemed to be replicable if the new beta blocks were added to an older Rise course -- rebuild it and the issue goes away!
I'm happy to report that new course development with the new beta blocks consistently display as intended in our LMS!
Hi ShruthiMoon,
Great to see that Eric has been helping you.
I've opened a support case on your behalf and sent you an email with steps on how to share your affected Rise course with our team. I've also included more on the LMS details that'll be helpful when troubleshooting the issue.
We can continue the conversation through your case!
StevenBenassi I've submitted the pieces you asked for today. Fingers crossed there is an easy solution!
- ElenaUrbanova9 days agoCommunity Member
Hi, we published a web output with custom blocks and had the same problem. The problem was that we kept the URL, but changed the content. And apparently the browser cache remembered some javascripts and was confused that way. So we added some parameters to the URLs in the index.html file to force the browser to load the files again.
I attach a screenshot of what we did:- the meta tags are probably not important, we tried that first
- the underlined parameter seemed to do the trick, but maybe all of them contribute
- the parameters can be whatever, but if you republish, then they have to be changed to something else (?time=123 -> ?time=124 or ?v=2 etc.)
It is not ideal, but the cache seems to be the culprit. Either browser cache or possibly in some cases the LMS's cache. And this could help. Also CTRL+F5 helped in our case, but we wanted the best possible experience for the people. The alternative was to write beneath the first custom block that "If you don't see XY, press CTRL+F5". That would not require going into the source files of the published output.
Related Content
- 7 months ago
- 7 months ago
- 7 months ago
- 7 months ago