Demystifying SCORM/TinCan/Javascript reporting to SCORM Cloud

Hi Phil,

We're trying a lot to see what works; we've been leaning toward TinCan since we hear it's the newer, more advanced reporting method, but as I said in my last post, our analysts will likely prefer SCORM 2004 if the reports show latency times and plain text for answers, rather than "choice_(randomlettersandnumbers)".

I was pretty sure you would need to visit the survey question slide for that to work but boy... the tutorial about that sure is misleading about "hiding the slide from learners." Perhaps shorten the length of the slide to a fraction of a second and have it advance automatically? So they *barely* see it?

I guess then our major confusion lies with Java triggers, custom xAPI statements, whether there is a difference between those, and if it would be possible to implement them while also getting the SCORM question/answer reporting detail we already know works.