A while back I wrote an article on five ideas for turning boring bulleted lists into engaging interactions. Fundamentally, those ideas were about transforming static content into something mo...
Published 9 years ago
Version 1.0
Blog Post
Thank you so much! I was beginning to think that because our courses (which mostly share information) weren't scenario-based and ultra interactive, they were somehow less effective--and definitely not as "good." To be sure, I'll still strive for interactivity whenever possible, but I'll also continue to emphasize graphic design principles and traditional instructional design conventions!
- Michelle, thanks for sharing your comments. It sounds as if we're developing the same types of courses and I've had some of the same feelings as you. I guess the phrase "less is more" really does apply sometimes. I will keep striving for excellence in the principles that are important for my courses and at the same time make them as engaging as possible. Thanks Trina.
- Thanks for reading and commenting, Michelle. I think you're right that there are a lot of different ways to define "good"e-learning. Just because something isn't full of clicks and scenarios doesn't mean it's not effective.
