Forum Discussion
Open text box/field in Rise 360
Hi. Is it possible to add an open, blank text field in a lesson on Rise 360? I would like users of my course to be able to write reflective comments as I pose questions.
Thanks, Dan.
54 Replies
in favour for this functionality it Rise 360 :)
+ 1!
I agree with all of the above. It seems that the easier work around would be to adjust the knowledge check for 'fill in the blank'. Give the option to for the user to fill in their self-reflection and it be recorded and saved. Adjust it so no 'feedback' has to be given, and any 'answer' is acceptable.
Also would like to see the Fill in the Blank field adjusted to account for free text responses without the Incorrect/Correct feedback.
I am looking to create a open text entry question In Rise that provides feedback, and it still is not possible. I feel there is high limitations still with the Knowledge Checks in Rise...These seem to have been noted for quite some time but currently remain the same. The workaround with storyline still is a difficulty that probably should have been amended by now, as we are dealing with lesson development that seems to lack many options of testing a users knowledge...is storyline import the best way around getting an open text entry into Rise?
Hi Ronan! We're still tracking requests for this feature. Rest assured that we'll share it here as soon as we have updates. In the meantime, you can try to embed a third-party survey, like Survey Monkey or Google Forms as an alternative option to Storyline. I hope this helps!
The open text entry feature would be great to see added!
I, too, would love an open text entry feature to facilitate reflective questions!
Just to add my request for this functionality, it can be used as an activity to help learners embed and reflect. Look forward to seeing an update.
Yes, please add this feature ASAP! I just assumed that would be an option...
Please add this open text field, with the option for it to be reviewed to Rise 360!
This is a very telling thread. Three years of steady requests for what customers/course designers expect to be a standard feature, and three years of the feature not being added. Looking at the list of planned/in-development features, it looks like there's a disconnect here: several of the planned features are focused on how the course looks, while course designers are requesting more attention to *how* course participants learn and engage with the course. This really gives the impression that the company's priorities are out of sync with customer/potential customer priorities. Anyone currently entering the learning & development profession is learning about the importance of engagement-based learning, with open-ended questions and reflection exercises. This is especially increasing in adult and corporate learning. Three years of "We'll think about it" is really out of step with what is now a standard customer expectation.
