Storyline Question | Reporting using SCORM 2004 - drag and drop interaction

You can't change what SCORM 2004 reports, as with interactions in Storyline it is all or nothing. You can influence the information contained in the data though. For drag and drops, the following naming convention is used: element name + text content of the element. Which is why you see a name such as "subject_-_SUBJECT" as it picks up the name of the element, "subject" and the text content "SUBJECT" and then concatenates them using "_-_". Therefore, to have the drop targets make more sense, just add text content as I have done in the attached example. The text is hidden (same colour as background and 1pt in size), and then each of the drop targets labelled "DROP{n}" where "{n}" is the number, so you end up with something like "DROP6_-_Do_the_ideas_flow___Does_each_part_of_what_I_m_writing_make_sense_in_relationship_top_all_the_other_parts_".

The [,] you see is required for SCORM 2004 and just separates the individual responses, whilst [.] separates the drag/drop target answer pairs. Here's an example of the my full attempt as seen in SCORM Cloud.

MY RESPONSE

DROP1_-_Do_I_have_anything_meaningful_and_memorable_to_say_[.]DRAG1_-_SUBJECT[,]DROP2_-_Will_readers_enjoy_what_I_ve_said_in_my_work_[.]DRAG6_-_AUDIENCE[,]DROP3_-_Did_I_select_the_correct_genre_(essay_article__etc.)__Does_my_work_meet_the_guidelines_of_the_genre_I_m_working_in_[.]DRAG3_-_FORM[,]DROP4_-_Does_the_structure_organization_work__is_it_effective__and_is_it_the_best_way_to_present_my_ideas_[.]DRAG5_-_DEVELOPMENT[,]DROP5_-_Do_I_sufficiently_elaborate_on_my_ideas___Do_I_provide_enough_information_[.]DRAG2_-_DIMENSIONS[,]DROP6_-_Do_the_ideas_flow___Does_each_part_of_what_I_m_writing_make_sense_in_relationship_top_all_the_other_parts_[.]DRAG4_-_TONE[,]DROP7_-_Does_the_writing_convey_my_attitude_towards_the_topic___Does_my_writing_include_emotion__wit__and_a_human_element_[.]DRAG7_-_STRUCTURE