Forum Discussion
SCORM 1.2 Suspend Data--Seems Wonky to My Pea Brain
For the last couple of weeks I've been working on a SCORM 1.2 resume issue for a Storyline 2 course that I'm trying to finish up on for a client. I posted on this previously but that post appears not to be available now in the new forums. So here's an update . . .
First of all, I have to say the Articulate front-line support person that I've been working with has been very helpful and very responsive. Couldn't ask for a better experience there.
Anyway, back to the problem. Basically, I have a SCORM 1.2 course that, after you launch it from the LMS and fail the final quiz, you, say you exit from the quiz results page. When you re-launch the course later to re-try the final quiz, and bookmarking kicks in, you are not returned to the quiz results page but to somewhere in the middle of the quiz to a quiz question that needs answering.
So bookmarking appears not to work right.
After that happened I filed a case and working with Articulate support, we confirmed it was a issue with the amount of resume (of suspend) data. It was exceeding the SCORM 1.2 limit of 4096 characters as nicely described here in the KB.
So, when re-launching the quiz turns out I was being returned to just before the SCORM 1.2 4096 character limit had been reached in the previous session, which makes sense.
So, working from a couple of my own ideas and more suggestions from my fellow Super Heroes (thank you, Steve F. and Phil. M) I tried to reduce the suspend data in the course by trying some of these things:
- Publish to SCORM 2004 3rd or 4th Edition or Tin Can/Experience if you can or LMS supports. (Not an option here--the LMS only supports AICC and SCORM 1.2, and SCORM 2004, for a variety of reasons, is not an option).
- Reduce the number of slides in a course.
- Reduce the # of layers in a course
- Consider using lightbox slides for layers that repeat over many slides or come from masters.
- Set as many slides as you can to "reset to initial state" if you can.
- Reduce the number of questions in a quiz or cut any freeform interactions that you can.
- Use freeform questions instead of text based questions as less data may be sent.
- Reduce the use of longform variable strings.
The course is fairly short, just 50-55 slides. Most slides have a pause layer and transcription layer for displaying narration text. Three of the slides are separate multiple response quiz questions at the end of the topics and 10 slides are simple multiple-select questions for the final quiz.
The course also use a mandated Storyline template that the client had developed by another firm. I had to use that template with little, if any, variations.
The master had 4 layers on the layouts which I was able to cut down to just two by moving two of the layout layers over to two lightbox slides. The other two layers I could not reduce due to the way lightbox slides currently work in Storyline (needed more customization than currently is permitted).
To verify the suspend data overage, Articulate Support had me turning on LMS debugging in the course and send them the log files. So, after providing that for them, I decided to watch the log files myself and record the amount of suspend data after I had moved to a new slide.
If you've not set up a LMS debug file for a SCORM course, this is how you do it.
Actually, kind of fun to watch the debug file generate and see how it builds up with and after each slide in a course. Neat tool.
And this is the line you want to look for in the LMS debug file to see the suspend data.
This command will appear many times as you deal a with a slide (so I was always looking at most latest occurrence of the string in the debug file for my character counts).
For that line, eliminate the "strValue=" and anything before it and then copy the data after (for that line only) and then bring that text into something like Notepad++, and then select all the text to get a character count for the resume data.
And when you exceed the SCORM 1.2 data limit, you'll see a line like this with "intSCORMError=405" in the LMS debug file.
Now my method for recording the suspend data was not exactly perfect as recording the suspend data after moving to a new slide also includes data for visiting that new slide. But I was mainly looking for general trends in going from slide to slide.
Going through simple, click-to-read slides with simple narration seemed to add only 7-20 characters per slide (and usually just 7 characters) when moving to a new slide. Seems like a reasonable number to moi.
However, when looking at the "check your knowledge" questions and the final quiz questions, what I found initially was jaw-dropping. I was seeing well over 400 characters generated for each. So just with my 10-question final quiz, I'd was going over the 4096 character limit for SCORM 1.2 suspend data.
After trying some of the things I listed above to reduce resume data, I was able to get the quiz questions to over 200 characters per question.
But still too much data . . .
This past weekend, I re-created the quiz from scratch using the default plain template in Storyline and nothing else. Quiz questions seemed to now add over 100 characters of resume data--pretty consistently 114-115 characters regardless of the amount of text in the question answers.
Much better but still too much data to my (limited :) ) way of thinking. And I'm left to ask what in the real course itself is causing that number to be even higher?
If there is indeed something in the template causing things to balloon up, it'd be nice if we as developers could know that to prevent that in the future.
Now here's the kicker. I took an earlier version of the course that was done in Storyline 1 Update 5 and published it out to SCORM 1.2 and set it up in the LMS. I went through the course, touching each slide and quiz questions, and failed the final quiz. I then exited the course from the final quiz results page and looked at the last suspend data string sent to the LMS.
Then I opened the same course up with Storyline 2 Update 1 and published it out to SCORM 1.2 and set up a new course in the LMS. I then went through the course exactly as I had before, and answering every quiz question the same. Again, I exited from the quiz results page and looked at the last suspend data string sent to LMS.
I then compared character counts from both trials: The Storyline 2 Update 1 version had produced 32% MORE SUSPEND data.
Now I'm not a programmer and my old pea brain may not understand all what is going on, but I'm left with at least a couple of possibilities . . .
1) Storyline's suspend data generation MIGHT POSSIBLY BE inefficient and could benefit from some tightening. Again, I'm not a programmer but I scratch my head when it takes at least over 100 characters (in a plain vanilla version of the course) and over 200 or 400 characters each in the designed version of course with the mandated template to record my answers to a simple multiple choice quiz question. Something doesn't seem right to me there . . .
2) Something in the course is causing the resume data to balloon up to over 200 or 400 characters when the plain vanilla version only has over 100 characters. But what is that? I'm using Storyline as it is meant to be used, and the supplied template isn't doing anything special or highly customized. So why the difference in suspend character counts? Is Storyline 2 keeping track of a lot of new things as we proceed through a course?
One more kicker--publishing to AICC produced nearly the same amount of resume data as its SCORM 1.2 counterpart (which is good). However the course didn't have the bookmarking problem at re-launch.
AICC has the same suspend data character limit of 4096 characters. But it appears that this LMS was not enforcing the AICC character limit the way it was with SCORM 1.2. An unexpected, but very lucky, result--and a temporary solution.
Unfortunately, using AICC is just an interim solution at best. The client the course is for wants SCORM 1.2 as they will be migrating to a new LMS soon and it may not support AICC. And the new LMS does not support Tin Can yet and they're currently having trouble getting SCORM 2004 3rd of 4th edition to work.
Sorry for the long post but I thought I'd share my recent experience in case it might help someone else in some way. Starting to feel like I'm engaged in one of the labors of Hercules . . . ;)
Hoping I hear something more definitive from Articulate support soon. The QA team is looking at it.
With fingers crossed . . .
79 Replies
- BarryHinksCommunity Member
I'd echo others in this thread in that having a list of items that increase the suspend data would help with designs. I've had a course working perfectly for 2 months, until I needed to share outside of the LMS on a platform for 3rd parties to access and now the course exceeds the suspend data limit on their LMS. I can only assume our LMS (Cornerstone) has an override for SCORM 1.2 limit.
This as others have said, at the last minute has caught me out and I've sat here today trying to reduce (unsuccessfully) the suspend data. I even separated the end test from the content (65pages) and this still leaves above the suspend limit, so what's causing it??!!
It would be so handy to have a top 20 / top 50 list of what contributes to the suspend data limit & a % ratio e.g. resume saved data on a page = 5% of your overall limit.
I can republish in SCORM 2004 which works in SCORM cloud but frustratingly the suppliers bespoke LMS doesn't recognise the resume feature in Storyline for SCORM 2004, but does in SCORM 1.2???!! Otherwise I'd have a solution, whereas now I've no idea what my next move is ...
Hi Barry,
I'm sure you've seen that the suspend data is not human readable, and that's due to our proprietary set up to help compress and help folks not hit the data limit. Folks have submitted feature requests to be able to uncompress it or access all the content included - but I don't know the viability of those based on the proprietary nature.
As you can see from this article about reaching the limit, things that are included are the resume status of the course, and each slide, variable value, etc.
Hope that helps a bit
Glad this worked for you Nick and thanks for sharing that tip here as well.
- IanPooleCommunity Member
I have recently experienced the same problem with exceeding the suspend data limit. Using the (very helpful) information in this discussion I switched on debug and did some tests.
The only way I found to reduce the data significantly was to set ALL slides to "Reset to initial state". For instance, a simple multi-choice question was sending 110 chrs back when the re-visit was set to "Automatically Decide". Changing it to "Reset to initial state" reduced the data to 9 chrs. My entire course went from over 10,000 chrs to around 1200 chrs. The course contains 147 slides including 9 sub-assessments, 10 result slides, 57 questions spread across 33 question banks. Passing the nine sub-assessments achieves a course pass via a final result slide.
Unfortunately the ability to review answers is lost when the slides are set to "Reset to initial state". So, I used a custom variable for each of the nine sub-assessments to hold a copy of the scorepercent variable for each. These were used with sliders to show how the student performed in each. If the student stops and starts the course these custom variables (and the slider positions) are maintained and they can pick up where they left off. Although they can't review their answers they can see which of the assessment topics they need to re-visit before attempting it again.
Thanks Ian for sharing that information here and perhaps if you have a chance to share the .story file that may help others looking to set up something similar.
- IanPooleCommunity Member
Hi Ashley
Thanks for the response. Unfortunately I'm not able to upload the file as it is classified.
If I get a chance (don't hold your breath!) I'll create a cut down version without the classified content.
Regards
Ian :)
Thanks Ian - also in case the information in your signature is classified, you may want to visit this thread and edit your response. Signatures are included automatically when you reply via email.
- StephanSinkaCommunity Member
I would like to add a GREAT Solution from another forum, namely the concern for the usability of the suspend data, this would help resolve both forum issues by allowing us to see what is being pushed to the LMS
Deborah Seidman &James Jordan
16 days ago
I don't have a problem with them compressing the data. I have a problem in their not releasing a tool to be able to look at the data. If they want to keep the routines close to their vest them they could simply publish a tool on their website like google translate. You paste something on the left and push a button to get uncompressed data on the right. If you edit what's on the right you should be able to click a button to translate it back to the left. Not supplying anything is the ultimate frustration. Thanks Stephan for linking to that other thread - as I know questions of suspend data and how to read through it are common questions in the forums, but not something our team can offer support for.
- StephanSinkaCommunity Member
Ashley,Justin has made an even clearer explanation THanks!
Justin Grenier Author Stephan Sinka
26 minutes ago
Good Morning, Stephan.The decision to compress Suspend Data is less about protecting proprietary information and more about making sure we don't exceed the data limits that some Learning Management Systems impose.
Further still, we can't offer a web-based suspend data decoding tool right now since our compression/decompression routine is dependent on XML data that is unique to every project. It is not possible to decode the suspend data without first parsing the XML and then creating the correct object structure to read it. Again, we're not trying to hide anything. It's just that this model honestly isn't achievable at the moment.
If you have a set of LMS Debug Logs that we can help you diagnose, please feel free to send them over and we'll be happy to take a look:
https://www.articulate.com/support/contact/submit.php
Thanks for adding your voice to our community!
- NatashaBomba-Community Member
Has there been any futher resolution to this issue? I can see the last post was 8 months ago. We are piloting SL2 for our organization but have an LMS that will only support SCORM 1.2. If we are saying to avoid the freeform questions, does that mean everything has to be built manually? Is it only for the final (scored) test or all the interactions in between (not scored).
Thanks.
Related Content
- 12 months ago
- 11 months ago