Forum Discussion
Organising project phases
Love this question Aïda_Domínguez — and I think this could be a great place to see a wide range of commenters since like JudyNollet mentioned this is probably something that every project does slightly differently.
But, for me when I'm launching a new project in this vein I find it can be helpful to create a pretty prescriptive quality assurance form to make sure you're soliciting the right feedback. I find when I'm more open-ended about the feedback I'm looking for it may still be high quality, but it might not actually cover all the bases.
It can be more helpful to direct people on the steps you want them to take and have you tell them specifically about them—so for example, have them respond separately about things like typos or grammatical errors or broken links, vs things like "how engaging or helpful was this piece of content."
Really curious to hear how others in this community approach quality assurance—gonna tag in some folks I think might have something interesting to say here: KellOrding CherylStGermain ChrisMcAllis074 ErinParks PhoebeSterdan-0
Completely agree! The feedback phase is right now one of my pain points, specially when there is more than one person reviewing content and they have different fields of expertise. The idea of separating the feedback per area sounds like a first step towards a solution! Thanks also for tagging ^^