Review 360 versions
Version numbering for Reviews is a confusing thing. Review 360 just numbers them sequentially but in my world I have many kinds of review. It may be version 15 for Review 360 but Review two for my stakeholder. This creates a lot of confusion. I would be great if we could rename the version numbers to what make sense for our team.Review 360 versions
First, thank you for the updates you have made regarding commenting between Storyline 360 and Review 360. They are helping. Here are some further thoughts. I love being able to add comments directly in Storyline but when I get to the Feedback Tab in Review 360 sometimes they are listed under "Scene not found". Also, they don't have the associated thumbnail provided for reference. Even better than consistently having the associated thumbnail it would be great to click on the comment and have it jump to the slide itself. I love the "hide review" feature, but when I hide it I want it to be completely hidden from my reviewers. They get confused by all the different versions and what they need to look at. Typically I want them to see the first version (the original version) and the current version. Everything in between with all the internal reviews and comments are often not relevant to the stakeholder. I want to be able to delete reviews and not just hide them. I've published by mistake before and I can't get rid of them. Some day it would be great to have the option of doing a version comparison. It would be nice to have more control over which comments are seen across the versions.Please Add Universal Continue Button Settings or Override for Rise
Courses I support use restricted navigation in the Articulate Rise materials I create for them. While necessary for the students, continue buttons that require completion of prior interactions are very cumbersome for the SMEs when they review the Articulate assignments. I can toggle Restricted Navigation off before publishing to Articulate Review, which helps the SMEs a little, but within a lesson/section, the issue with restricted continue buttons remains. It would be brilliant to have a Continue Button Override checkbox we could turn on when publishing to Review, either greying them out or making all of them unlocked. This would allow collaborators to review projects without needing to complete every interaction.Review version clearer
Hi, When I make revisions in Rise based on Review comments, I post responses. This then leads team members to think that I have published the correction from Rise, when I haven't yet done that. One UI solution would be to make the publication date of the current version in Review prominent, so that it's easier to compare the comment date with the version date. Thanks, NickPublishing from Rise to Review: UI Menu correction
Hello, I have made mistakes publishing to the wrong Review course because there is a default item selected in the "Publish a new version of an existing item" menu of the publishing page. It would be helpful to make the default menu option something like "Select Review course" to avoid making errors. Thanks, NickSOCIAL LEARNING in Articulate Rise
I LOVE Articulate Rise but... I am aware of the fact that the possibilities for Social Learning with these courses are none. And what I mean by that is the letting the learners to drop comments about specific sections of the course and have replies and interactions with those comments. I know it is hard to develop something from scratch but... wait a minute! That is exactly what the REVIEW 360 section does with the courses. What if.... Articulate uses the same engine to manage comments already available for Review 360 and let us use it to be able to add comments to blocks of the course?? Please respond or vote to this if you agree. I am not optimist, but you never know.
