Truly Embed Storyline Blocks
I really enjoy the Storyline Block feature in Rise. Wouldn't it be cool to really really embed Storyline Blocks into Rise? What i mean is that if you would update a piece of Storyline in the review section it would also actually be updated to the Rise Course(s) anywhere referring to. This would mean we don't have to: Update Rise course(s) Publish it to Scorm(s) Update the Scorm(s) in the LMS And thus save a lot of effort. It's kind of like a Vimeo based solution embedded into a rise course but then with interactivity included. I tried a possible workaround by using the embed function in Rise, adding a link to the preview but that doesn't work. Maybe there is another option i could try? Until then i hope that more people need this an that it would be adopted as added functionality! Thanks, PeterPlayer option in layer setting
Hi Team, As we all know, the replay button doesn’t function when using resume states. Would it be possible to have an option in the layer settings—similar to the one in the slide settings—for choosing between the default player and a custom player? This would make it easier to remove unused buttons and streamline the interface.Can link in PDF works after publishing in SL
Hello Team, Is it possible to modify the settings for the attached PDF link so that it opens in a new tab when clicked, instead of loading in the same tab? Currently, it opens in the same tab, and we have to use the back button to view the PDF again. Thank you!Changing the template from MCQ to MSQ
Hi Team, Is it possible to implement a feature that allows switching between MCQ and MSQ templates—similar to how it's done in Rise—without affecting the existing states and options? Currently, once we select a template (MCQ or MSQ) and begin building, changing the template requires starting over from scratch. It would be great if we could simply toggle between the two (e.g., changing radio buttons to checkboxes) without losing our progress or rebuilding the interaction.Changing MCQ to MSQ easily in SL
Hi Team, Is it possible to implement a feature that allows switching between MCQ and MSQ templates—similar to how it's done in Rise—without affecting the existing states and options? Currently, once we select a template (MCQ or MSQ) and begin building, changing the template requires starting over from scratch. It would be great if we could simply toggle between the two (e.g., changing radio buttons to checkboxes) without losing our progress or rebuilding the interaction.Allow publishing access for more than one owner
My team works in a very collaborative environment and the "owner" of the course in Rise360 may not be the only owner or the only person that needs access to publish the course to our LMS. We previously all had access to publish the course as long as we were listed as collaborators (manager or editor). As of today, this access is gone and only the owner has the option to publish the course. I saw in Articulate Community that this question has been asked previously in the context of an employee leaving the organization and it was recommended to just share the link. This does not allow us to publish the course in our LMS to track completion for compliance. I'm not sure what changed for us to previously have access to the publish feature regardless of ownership or why we no longer have the access to do so, but there should at the very least be an option to assign collaborators as "co-owners" so we can have equal publishing/modification rights on team projects. Thank you!Ideas Portal
The community has suggested a huge amount of ideas over the years. Can we have a searchable portal so we can see them all in one place: ID/Category/Post Date/Review Date/Description/Comments/Votes/Related Ideas Status Reviewed Under Consideration Low Probability of Delivery Fair Probability of Delivery In-Progress Currently AvailableRequest Review - add ability to send a reminder
I've been utilizing the Request Review feature in Review360 to send out courses to our SMEs to review. It would be GREAT to have some functionality added to allow me to send a reminder message when the SME hasn't started their review. I didn't want to sent a Due Date when I sent the initial review request because the timeline is really on the SME side of things. It would also be nice to see or receive a copy of the initial request for record keeping purposes.
