Scenario Feedback - Removing dialogue box
Hi, I'm currently building a scenario with dialogue in Rise 360. I have a character who asks a question, followed by three response options for the learner to choose from. The issue I'm having is that the feedback for each correct/incorrect response appears in a speech bubble/dialogue box coming from the character. In this context, that doesn't really make sense, as the feedback is instructional rather than something the character would say. Is there a way to change the feedback so that it appears in a standard feedback box instead of as character dialogue? Or is this behaviour fixed within the scenario block? Thanks for any advice! RRise 360 Hindi Course Grade 1 Colors Animals Introduction Action Words Feedback Welcome
Hello E-Learning Heroes Community! I am Abha Sharma, a Hindi language educator with 15+ years of experience and former Head of Hindi Department at National Public School, Bangalore, India. I am transitioning into Instructional Design and this is my second Rise 360 course! About This Course: Subject: Hindi Language Audience: Grade 1 students, ages 5 to 6 Topics: Colors, Animals, Self Introduction, Action Words How I Structured It: Lessons 1 and 2 are revision of content students already know. Then I introduce 3 new colors, 2 new animal names and 2 new action words. This follows a spiral curriculum approach — revise first, then build new learning on top. I Would Love Feedback On: Is the revision to new content flow clear for Grade 1 learners? Is content chunked well for age 5 to 6? Are interactions engaging enough for young learners? Any Rise 360 tips for designing for very young learners? Review link: https://360.eu.articulate.com/review/content/399ea5f8-037d-43c9-af65-aea91340308f/review Thank you so much! Any feedback means the world to me. Abha Sharma Hindi Educator | Instructional Designer in TrainingAre We Designing for Learning or Just Adding More Clicks? 🤔
I've been thinking a lot lately about how we approach interactivity in e-learning, especially with all the amazing tools and features available to us in Rise and Storyline. As instructional designers, we have so many creative ways to engage learners, but I sometimes wonder if we're making things interactive because they genuinely support learning or simply because we can. For me, the goal has always been to move beyond presenting information and create experiences that help learners actually apply what they've learned. Sometimes that means a scenario, a decision-making activity, or an opportunity to practice (I would love to hear ideas about how you do this one). I'd love to hear how others approach this. What's your personal rule of thumb for deciding whether an interaction truly adds value to a learning experience? And even better, have you ever removed or simplified an interaction and found that the learning experience actually improved? I'd love to hear your experiences, examples, and lessons learned. One of my favorite things about this community is how much we can learn from each other's approaches!AI Avatars in SCORM File Not Loading
Hi all! I'm loving using the new AI Avatars in Rise. I've created some for several courses and they look and sound great. However, I'm running into an issue where the learner (field sales agents often taking the training from their field sales tablet or mobile phone) are not seeing the AI Avatar videos populate and therefore cannot move forward in the module. Additionally, I tried it on my phone (iPhone with Safari) and had the same issue. What could potentially be the issue here? I want to keep using them, but it creates a poor experience for the agents trying to complete their training. ThanksExternal Use of Characters
Hi, Is it okay to download or screenshot the available characters and their various poses from Storyline and Rise, use them in another programme to create a video, and then import that video back into your Storyline or Rise project, provided it is not used anywhere else? Thank you in advance for any help with this.AI Voiceover delay
Good morning! I'm experiencing a new issue with my Articulate Storyline that I need help with. I used the AI text-to-speech feature, and when I go into Review, the audio doesn’t play in sync with the timeline. The notes and recording captured the entire script, and when I preview the voiceover after creating the script, it plays as expected. However, when I publish the course to Review 360 or preview the slide, the audio consistently skips the first three or four words. Does anyone have any experience with this issue or any advice on AI text-to-speech?Extra spacing when using native bulleted list
I have identified an issue with Rise where extra spacing is assigned to the last bullet of an unordered list <ul>, creating a visible gap on both desktop and mobile.But it is made more apparent on mobile as the gap creates a white background also, this is evident when the blocks have background colours assigned. it appears to be within the <ul> tag and margin-block property. Is anyone aware of this issue and is there a workaround? Thanks very muchRise courses across US & EU: Why are we still unable to transfer courses between data centers?
Articulate users working with clients in different regions (US + EU), did you know that you may hit a serious limitation in Rise? You can’t transfer Rise courses between data centers. Here’s the situation Articulate introduced the EU data center. Good move. But in practice, this split European users into two groups: Long-time users → most likely still on the US data center (unless they explicitly switched) Newer users → most likely on the EU data center (the new default for Europe) The problem? Rise courses cannot be shared across data centers. And Articulate’s solution? There isn’t one. Yes, you can switch from the US to the EU data center, but then you’re stuck: No migration path No export-import for Rise courses Switching data centers = rebuilding everything from scratch (!!!) What this means in real life For anyone working across multiple clients, this creates a real headache: Established European clients often stay on the US data center. Not by choice, but because rebuilding everything isn’t realistic. Newer European clients are most likely on the EU data center. Freelancers and agencies working across both end up stuck in between. Articulate’s “solution”? Ask your client to pay for an extra seat so you can work in their environment. Pay for two licenses yourself (US + EU). I think both are unacceptable. For a tool so widely used across Europe, the inability to move content between data centers is a significant gap. And I genuinely don’t understand why Articulate doesn’t prioritise finding a solution (a real solution!) to this issue. What I’d like to hear from European users Are you staying on the US data center because switching isn’t realistic? Has anyone actually switched to the EU data center? How are you dealing with this in client projects where you are on different data centers? And how do you feel about how Articulate is handling this?
