articulate 360
170 TopicsAllow publishing access for more than one owner
My team works in a very collaborative environment and the "owner" of the course in Rise360 may not be the only owner or the only person that needs access to publish the course to our LMS. We previously all had access to publish the course as long as we were listed as collaborators (manager or editor). As of today, this access is gone and only the owner has the option to publish the course. I saw in Articulate Community that this question has been asked previously in the context of an employee leaving the organization and it was recommended to just share the link. This does not allow us to publish the course in our LMS to track completion for compliance. I'm not sure what changed for us to previously have access to the publish feature regardless of ownership or why we no longer have the access to do so, but there should at the very least be an option to assign collaborators as "co-owners" so we can have equal publishing/modification rights on team projects. Thank you!660Views19likes8CommentsAllow Rewind Function on Restricted Timelines
As a rule, due to the nature of our business and contracts with unions, we must ensure that our learners are watching the full slide or video without fast forwarding through the content, but the restricted timeline does not allow rewinding or jumping back a few seconds (5 or 10) or to any point previously viewed until the entire video or slide has completed. This is extremely frustrating for our learners as a slight distraction could mean missing an important concept or content until possibly the end of the 15 minute video when they would then be able to drag the seekbar back. Requests have come in to also adjust the replay icon to allow small segments of time on that icon (which does not seem to work on a restricted seekbar w the slide set to resume saved state - another issue).Solved603Views12likes13CommentsCustomizable "Invalid Answer" as a Feedback Master
Greetings, I would like to suggest adding a feedback master to properly edit the "invalid answer" or "You must answer before proceeding" prompt. Please note that we currently have "Correct Answer", "Incorrect Answer", "Retry", "Review" and "Thank you". I'm aware that the "Invalid answer" is a player prompt and not a slide one, but having the ability to customize it like other feedbacks would greatly help homogenizing our designs. Thanks in advance :)378Views5likes7CommentsAllow Audio in Rise 360 Knowledge Check Feedback
Currently, Rise 360 allows audio in Knowledge Check questions but not in the feedback shown after learners answer. This means feedback can only be provided as text. Many learners benefit from hearing feedback as well as reading it, including people with dyslexia, learners experiencing cognitive overload, and those who prefer audio reinforcement. The current workarounds are using separate audio blocks, which are not conditional on the learner's answer, or rebuilding the interaction in Storyline. Feature request: Allow course creators to upload audio for Correct, Incorrect and Continue feedback messages. Even a simple audio upload option would support more inclusive learning and reduce the need for Storyline-based workarounds.52Views2likes3CommentsBrand Kit dark mode
There should be a Dark Mode option for the Brand Kit, where the course background can automatically switch to a dark theme and the logo, text and other interface elements adapt to white or other appropriate contrast colors for better brand consistency and accessibility. Additionally, it should allow us to upload logo variations specifically for the dark theme, ensuring the correct logo version is automatically applied when Dark Mode is enabled.32Views1like1CommentDirect Stock Image Library Integration in Rise 360
Would it be possible to integrate external stock image libraries directly into Rise 360? Many organizations already have subscriptions to licensed stock image libraries and use them as their primary source for course imagery (e.g., Shutterstock, Envato, BigStock, etc.). Currently, the workflow requires us to leave Rise, search the external library, download the asset, and then upload it into Rise. It would be extremely helpful if Rise could allow users to: Search connected stock image libraries directly within Rise Preview available images while working on a course Insert a selected, licensed image directly into a Rise block Retain the asset/source information for reference Connect an organization's existing stock library subscription Potentially allow AI to recommend images based on the lesson content With the continued development of AI features in Rise, I think there is an opportunity to take this even further. For example, AI could understand the content of a lesson and suggest relevant images from an organization's connected or approved stock libraries, while still allowing the course designer to make the final selection. For organizations producing a large volume of e-learning courses, this could save a significant amount of time and make the image-selection workflow much more efficient. Is integration with external stock image libraries something Articulate is considering for the Rise 360 roadmap?42Views1like1CommentDirect publishing option to other LMS than Thinkific
Hi team, thank you for the new direct publishing option to Thinkific. Are direct integrations for other LMS platforms (e.g., Lifter, Moodle, Docebo) planned, covering direct export and, if available, import? And is there a timeline or roadmap you can share? The Thinkific integration uses OAuth authorization and SCORM packaging, and Thinkific offers public REST and GraphQL APIs, so similar integrations should be feasible for other LMS platforms with comparable open interfaces. For now, we rely on manual SCORM/xAPI packages for all other LMS platforms. Thanks, PeterNeelmeyer27Views1like0CommentsAI Image, Media, Prompt Library/History
Hi, I am relatively new to the e-learning/Articulate world and I haven't used Articulate as much as many others in this community. However, one of the things that I think could be a valuable asset to the AI assistant would be a library of any previously generated images or prompts. This would be valuable in a few settings that I thought of. Maintaining a certain image style throughout the course. Revising of other AI generated images/audio that has been added and then deleted from the course to be able to pick up where I left off with the prompt. Referencing previously well developed prompts that I would like to use again. Having the library or a history of my prompts would be valuable to help the forward momentum of the project instead of constantly starting over in the AI prompt. I understand I can simply save the images or prompts to a local drive or cloud storage. However, often times I forget or don't think to save them in the moment. I believe having this built into Articulate would make the usage more intuitive and user friendly. Thank you! Amanda Buzzell83Views4likes3CommentsFeature Request: AI-Generated Image Label Toggle
Hello Articulate Team, I would like to suggest a feature that would significantly improve the usability of Rise 360 and Storyline, especially for organizations operating under emerging EU transparency requirements. Many companies in the EU are increasingly required to clearly label AI-generated images. Currently, when using AI-generated visuals in courses, course authors often have to manually create and position labels or banners on every single image. This process is extremely time-consuming and prone to inconsistencies. Suggested Feature Please consider adding an optional toggle or checkbox for images, such as: ✅ "Mark as AI Generated" When enabled, Articulate could automatically display a small standardized overlay, badge, watermark, or banner on the image, for example: "AI Generated" or "Created with AI" Possible options could include: Position selection (top-right, bottom-right, etc.) Different label styles Automatic application across the entire course Course-wide setting to label all AI-generated images at once This would save authors a tremendous amount of manual work and help organizations remain compliant with current and future transparency requirements. Question Is a feature like this already being considered or planned for future releases? Thank you for considering this idea. See picture down below. Best regards, Paul Schlage149Views4likes5Comments