Curious about best practices for course archives
I'm curious how others are managing - and what Articulate recommends - as the best replacement for the "publish CD" option. My company used "publish CD" to create legal archives for our 500+ WBTs. I don't know why that was the method of choice. We have to maintain 7 years of history on all WBTs, and have to be able to associate all versions to LMS transcript dates so that we can deliver exactly the version someone took on any given date. I need to revise our process away from the CD option and would love to hear thoughts/what others are doing.
We use Review for SME feedback, stakeholder acceptance, pilots, and delivering content outside of the LMS. I'm partial to Review, and think it would work well to have a dedicated "legal archive" folder to which we can publish a new version of the WBT each time a change is made. The date of the publish could be added to the filename each time so that we can associate a specific version of the WBT to the learner's transcript from the LMS. (I'm learning toward this process, but want to evaluate all pros/cons)
But other than web-based content, what do I functionally gain or lose that route compared to:
* Review, publish locally for manual upload, then saving the ZIP file to the same place we currently save the "publish CD" zips. This would mimic current process, so there's little change to implement.
* Web, which also seems to mimic the process we have now.
Is one of these a better option - why? Is one more sustainable than the others; less likely to go away down the road? Our legal team is good, but not technical, so unzipping and launching is the upper end of complexity I want them to be responsible for. I'd really appreciate any thoughts/input.