Forum Discussion
How does your organization support different ways of thinking and working?
For the neurodivergent folks in L&D…
Lately I’ve been thinking about what it’s actually like to build learning experiences with a neurodivergent brain, ADHD in my case. Not just how it influences my design decisions (as mentioned in my previous post), but how it shapes the experience of doing this work inside a team.
For me, neurodivergence shows up as a kind of heightened sensitivity to flow, clarity and cognitive load. It helps me spot moments where a learner might lose their place, or where a step needs more framing to feel safe and predictable. That part has become a real strength.
But there’s another layer I don’t see discussed much in our field:
How well do our teams understand the way our brains work?
Not in a clinical sense, more in the everyday reality of collaboration, feedback, expectations, and creative problem-solving.
Things like:
- having time to process before diving into solutions
- getting clear checkpoints instead of vague “keep going” feedback
- having tools and structure that reduce mental friction
- balancing flexibility with predictability
For some of us, these aren’t preferences. They directly affect how well we can design.
So I’m curious to hear from others who identify as neurodivergent, in whatever way that shows up for you:
Do you feel like your strengths and challenges as a neurodivergent designer are understood in your team or workflow?
And how does your neurodivergence influence the way you approach learning design itself?
Share only if you feel comfortable. I know these conversations can be personal.
But I also think they make our craft stronger, because the more we understand our own brains, the better we design for everyone else’s.
2 Replies
- Caitlin_BCommunity Member
Hi! AuDHD here. I am currently a teacher doing ID projects on the side and for my district.
I can share a challenge I often face - my brain moves like 9 million miles an hour, which can be a curse. I am often solving problems other people on my team didn’t even know existed before they happen - I love solving puzzles and I see so many angles to everything all the time.
Where many projects have lots of possibilities and ideas and experimentation, sometimes… because I see every step of the way immediately, I know something will absolutely not work. And I will only speak up if I absolutely know this. And every single time people accuse me of being closed minded or difficult. So I go along. And every single time…. It ends exactly how I think it will. And OFTEN colleagues will even comment that “oh I guess you were right!” But then the next time… we start all over again.
I absolutely love collaboration. I love when people have better ideas than I do. I love receiving constructive feedback. I want things to be done the best way no matter who figured it out and how we get there. So it really hurts to hear when people think I am closed minded or assume it’s an ago thing.Like you explained, I think it can be a gift in identifying possible difficulties for different learners and help problem solve before things roll out. But I don’t feel a lot of people really understand or appreciate it, and I’m not sure why.
I’m not sure this was helpful but you’re not alone! Really hoping to see more of everyone on a team really being valued for the differences they bring to the table.
- smousCommunity Member
Caitlin, thank you for sharing this. What you described is incredibly familiar.
Seeing several steps ahead, spotting where something will break, and being read as “closed-minded” because of it is something many AuDHD and ADHD designers experience.
Not because they lack openness, but because they are already mentally simulating outcomes while others are still exploring options.What stands out to me is that this isn’t a personality issue, it’s a structural one. When teams lack shared checkpoints or language for why something won’t work, early insight often gets misinterpreted as resistance.
Your point about loving collaboration matters too. Wanting strong outcomes and clear reasoning isn’t about ego, it’s about care for quality.
We’re not alone, and naming this so clearly is exactly how we start shifting toward ways of working that truly value different brains.
Thank you!