Review 360: can we transfer comments from one link to another?
Greetings, For a single Storyline project, I use Review 360 for the following groups... a link for our dev team a link for a group of clients a link for a different group of client I essentially have 3 Review links for the same SL file, all accessible with the comment pane. Can we transfer comments from the client group #2's link to our dev team's link, as they are for the same project? While I can access them with the comment pane in Storyline, our main issue is that we need to filter each comment and avoid responding to those, since the clients will be notified. Is there a way for me to "export comments from one link" and "import those comments in another link", hoping that each comment will be placed according to their respective slides? Thanks in advance :) P.S. I say Storyline, but I'm sure Rise could benefit from this.What if most course review pain points come from the same root issue?
I’ve been noticing something during course reviews that I can’t unsee anymore. A lot of the most common pain points in L&D tend to show up together: courses that feel unclear even when the content is accurate, long review cycles with lots of subjective feedback, inconsistent standards across modules or teams, stakeholder disagreement about “what good looks like,” cognitive overload on otherwise solid screens, accessibility gaps caught late, endless rewrites that don’t really improve the experience, and very little shared way to measure quality. Individually, these look like separate problems. But together, they start to feel like a standards and clarity gap, not a content gap. Lately, I’ve been exploring whether having a shared review lens — one that looks at clarity, consistency, accessibility, and experience as a whole — could reduce a lot of this friction earlier in the process. I’m curious: Do these issues tend to cluster for you too? Where do reviews usually break down? What’s helped you create more alignment, if anything? I’m interested in patterns more than tools.Enhancing Review 360 Feedback Management with Categorization Tags
Currently, in Review 360, feedback and comments provided during reviews are captured in a generic format without any structured categorization. This often leads to ambiguity when interpreting feedback, as reviewers and developers must manually infer whether a comment refers to an error, an enhancement suggestion, or a query. The lack of classification makes prioritization and resolution time-consuming, especially when handling large volumes of feedback across multiple stakeholders. Post-implementation of the proposed feature—a dropdown selection allowing users to tag feedback as Error, Enhancement, Query or Not applicable—the process becomes significantly more streamlined. Categorization at the point of entry ensures clarity, enabling teams to filter and sort feedback based on type, prioritize critical issues, and allocate resources effectively. This structured approach not only improves communication between reviewers and developers but also accelerates decision-making and enhances overall productivity by reducing misinterpretation and manual effort. This categorization should also be reflected in the generated reports.Ability to make text elements selectable
Allow storyline course developers choose if users can select text on specific elements, i.e., When in the "Format Shape" dialog, on the "Text Box" tab, if there could be a simple Radio button for "Selectable Text". With this switched on, users could select the text on screen to perform a copy paste, they could then use their assistive technology to read out the selection. Would be also good if there was a global setting that simply made any and all text elements in the course have "Selectable Text", i.e., switch the "Selectable Text" radio button on for all text elements in a course. Finally, this request stems from a user’s inability to use Mac VoiceOver in Safari (or any browser for that matter) to Select the Text in a course and have it read aloud to them. It is possibly for Mac VoiceOver to access the text elements via key commands (however, very clunky compared with other screen readers on the market). Using a screen reader isn’t always done via keyboard commands as this user clearly shows. Some (like this case) prefer to select text on screen and then have it read aloud rather than using key commands to navigate the Storyline screens. Accessibility requirement.Auto Play Audio
It has been mentioned a few times but I think this is a bigger issue than the developers realize. I am the lead on a major project and we are converting all of our safety training videos and on the job training courses through Rise 360. We have over 300 employees in our facility and well over 50% are English as a second language team members. Having an auto play feature in rise 360 is crucial for our success. It ensures that every employee—regardless of reading level or language proficiency—receives the full content of each lesson without missing critical information. Instead of relying on individuals to manually activate audio or navigate complex menus, the Auto Play function would deliver a consistent and accessible learning experience for everyone. This not only improves comprehension for our ESL team members but also reduces confusion, minimizes repeated training sessions, and ensures that all safety messages are communicated clearly and effectively. I really hope the developers come up with something soon, as I see this has been the concern of many since the start.Search functionality for unassigned trigger.
At present, we are required to manually inspect each page and layer for any unassigned triggers, which is a labor-intensive process and prone to oversight. This method is not only time-consuming but also increases the likelihood that some unassigned triggers may go unnoticed. There are instances when triggers remain unassigned due to various reasons, such as moving or reusing slides, or other operational factors. This can lead to significant functionality errors, which could impact the overall performance. To streamline this process and reduce the risk of errors, it would be highly advantageous to implement a search functionality specifically designed to identify and highlight unassigned triggers.Enhancement in shape angle option.
Currently, an angle option is available to set the corner radius of certain shapes. However, this option should be extended to all shapes that feature a yellow adjustment dot used for modifying angle elevation. For example, in the case of a parallelogram, we currently adjust the slant manually using the yellow dot. If we had the ability to set a specific angle for such shapes, it would greatly improve consistency across the course design. This enhancement would ensure uniformity in angle settings and reduce manual adjustments.Transcript option, with completion trigger by opening transcript or watching video
We always need to offer transcript options, along with closed captions, on any video or audio we include on a module. Currently, I have to add a separate link/text option for a transcript when adding a video, which means if I want the continue box to only activate upon completion, I have to put the transcript above the video and advise they still have to play the video, even if they are reading the transcript instead. I would like to suggest that a transcript option is available when adding video and audio, where the block completes when a user either finishes the video/audio OR opens the transcript. On real content templates, it would also be great to have the transcript automatically included in the same way. If you would like further details or a tester should this be considered, please get in touch. Many thanks Chris
