Course Results stay with user if moving teams
We have team members moving teams regularly and once you take them out of the team, if the course was allocated via the team it removes the course from the user profile. This result should stay with them even if they move teams. Workaround is not assign courses via teams, but would be good to have the option to allocate via a team.AI Automation - Build more efficiently with assistance
Hello, It was great catching up with one of the Articulate team at the excel L&D tech event yesterday in London. It gave me the opportunity to explore everything currently possible with the platform from an AI perspective before we look to include it in our package. (It's looking likely, it's a great addition to the platform, kudos to the team for implementing it!) I just wanted to pass on some suggestions and ideas I discussed with I think Charlotte, but forgive me if I misheard! I enquired about some automation capability with AI, in regard to building courses more efficiently which I understand is not currently possible. I thought I'd suggest it here to hear from the community and share it with you. For example: Template matching: Allow users to create and setup a "Templates" area that a bot can duplicate. Example use case: Creating large assessments with group branding, buttons, states and iconography in just a few clicks. I could upload an excel of the questions I would like to add, assign it to one of our pre-created templates and it will add in all the details for me and save a lot of time with formatting and editing slides. I could make sure the excel provided certain details such as: The question Any answers Feedback Graded Question Type Attempts Add to question Bank (Yes/No) Question Bank Name Assessment Name (For courses with multiple assessments) This could potentially work in a similar fashion with other types of defined automated AI tasks "Articulate-d" Want to make a decision tree with company branding, button states and triggers already assigned? Just gather those data points and build it in a matter of clicks. How about setting up a suite of videos for a new product launch? Add in the videos you want to share and select a template. Sharing multiple documents for a particular subject to build a resource hub? Add in any type of file and select a template. The possibilities are endless! It could really help us work smarter and not harder and take away those often time consuming and tedious tasks that are really important to ensure consistency across the business. Looking forward to seeing what is possible in the coming years!Go to "Last seen slide" and "[chronologically] previous slide"
Greetings, I would like to suggest a split trigger for the Back button, as right now, "Go to previous slide" brings you back to the "last slide you were on". By comparison, "Go to Next slide" follows the project's chronology. "Go to Last seen slide" could be useful for pop-up slides. "Go to previous slide" would follow the project's chronology. Thanks in advance :)Having a "trainer mode" in Preview
Hi Community! My team and I are working with Storyline since last year. We often come to a point where just a few triggers (or even only one) are not working as expected and here comes the problem: when setting up/changing a trigger we always have to preview the entire project to analyze if it's working as desired. Our courses tend to be very long, so previewing a course with having next disabled until users clicked everywhere next disabled until timeline ends only possible to move on when actions completed / statuses are visited ... can take up to 30 mins each time!! And this list could be longer, if you know you know ;) So: it would be more than awesome if something like a preview mode exists, where all of the mentioned restrictions could be toggled off for testing certain triggers. I hope I was able to bring my thoughts to an understandable point as English is not my 1st language. Thanks for reading and the opportunity to bring such discussions up. Greetings from GermanyCopy or move block/s from one lesson to another in Rise
Quite often when I am building out a module in rise, I create an awesome block/s within a lesson. But as I go on building and restructuring the module, the block/s or section better sit within another lesson in the same rise course. Currently, there is no way to copy or move blocks from one lesson to another - meaning I have to completely rebuild the blocks in the other lesson and delete from the original lesson. (The workaround, I think, is to save them as a template, insert the template into the other lesson, then delete the template, and delete from the original lesson). Can there be a function created that allows you to copy or move blocks to another lesson within the course without having to use the template workaround?Option to remove hand cursor on hover for buttons
Much like you implemented the option to show or not show the hand cursor on hover for hotspots, it would be great to have this option for buttons that have triggers associated with them. It's a bit of a giveaway to learners when one of the buttons has a hand cursor, and the others don't. I realize I can make triggers for all of the others as well, but I would prefer to keep the regular cursor. This will also help with the simulations that we make so that we can accurately mimic what a learner will see in their work environment. Most of the objects our learners choose in the platforms we simulate do not have a cursor that changes to a hand cursor. Thank you!We need an update to Engage 360
I appreciate how Engage allows me to quickly add interactive elements to my Storyline 360 course without needing to create them from scratch. However, I find its appearance somewhat outdated and its customization options limited. Are there any plans on the distant horizon to update this tool?Player option in layer setting
Hi Team, As we all know, the replay button doesn’t function when using resume states. Would it be possible to have an option in the layer settings—similar to the one in the slide settings—for choosing between the default player and a custom player? This would make it easier to remove unused buttons and streamline the interface.
