Rise Assessment Feedback Review
I cannot seem to find an in-built method of allowing a learner to review an assessment once they have passed it. I do not want to include feedback while undertaking an assessment, as I do not want to make a subsequent attempt too easy and allow for learners brute forcing their way through. However, once the learner has completed and (crucially) passed the assessment, it would be very useful if they could then review their answers in full to find out any questions they got wrong, as well as their correct answers.Log of all changes
We have a couple of team members who can edit courses who are in different departments. It would be really useful if Rise generated a log of all the changes being made to a course. That way the editors could see a list of things changed and the date they happened. At the moment at the root level you can see a course has been edited because the date has changed but there is no detail about what or where. e.g. a list containing: Date / Lesson Name / Block detail.Testing a “Second Set of Eyes” for Digital Learning
Hi everyone, I’m currently piloting something new and I’m looking for a few course creators who’d be open to testing it with me. I’ve been working on an instructional framework, designed to act as a structured second set of eyes on digital learning. The goal is to surface clarity, accessibility, and instructional integrity issues early, before review cycles get heavy or rework becomes costly. For those who might be interested, I’m offering "Clarity Snapshot": a short diagnostic that highlights where clarity or learner trust may be at risk, plus guidance on what matters most to address first. (on a Rise or Storyline course, in pdf version). Nothing to sell here, simply curious to have the precious input from other professionals No judgment on courses per se, it's really just to run some pilots. The main goal is to support designers and creators who care deeply about quality and want sharper signals than subjective feedback alone. If you’re curious and have a course you’d like a fresh set of eyes on, feel free to comment or DM me. Happy to share more context before anything else. Thanks for helping shape this.The translation step between storyboard and Rise
Hi everyone, I wanted to share an idea and sanity-check something with this community. One friction point I keep running into in Rise isn’t design or content creation, it’s the time it takes to "translate" an approved storyboard into a build that still makes instructional sense. Not rewriting anything. Not rethinking the learning. Just deciding how each piece of an already-approved storyboard should actually live in Rise. Which block type fits best? What order supports the learning objectives? What needs to be split, grouped, or signposted so the experience still works for learners? That translation step is where I see a lot of hours disappear. It’s also where instructional intent can quietly drift, simply because there are so many small judgment calls to make along the way. Lately I’ve been thinking about how that step could be faster and more consistent, without turning it into a push-button conversion or removing instructional judgment. I’ve seen a few options popping up, but they don’t really consider the instructional angle, or the pros and cons of different Rise block types from a learning perspective. I’m curious: How much time do you typically spend translating storyboards into Rise? Where do you feel the most drag or rework? What parts of that step feel most repetitive or manual? I’m pressure-testing a concept around this (while keeping instructional intent intact) and would love to exchange perspectives with anyone who’s felt this friction too. Thanks.Copy or move block/s from one lesson to another in Rise
Quite often when I am building out a module in rise, I create an awesome block/s within a lesson. But as I go on building and restructuring the module, the block/s or section better sit within another lesson in the same rise course. Currently, there is no way to copy or move blocks from one lesson to another - meaning I have to completely rebuild the blocks in the other lesson and delete from the original lesson. (The workaround, I think, is to save them as a template, insert the template into the other lesson, then delete the template, and delete from the original lesson). Can there be a function created that allows you to copy or move blocks to another lesson within the course without having to use the template workaround?Include a drag‑and‑drop block positioning functionality in Rise
Enhancement request - It would be great to have drag‑and‑drop functionality for repositioning blocks within a lesson. Using the up and down arrows works, but it's slow and clunky, being able to simply drag blocks to where they need to go would make editing much faster.Suggestion: Adding a custom asset library
Hello Articulate! With the addition of the new Custom Block, I have been playing around with certain graphics and elements that I upload using the Images option. Sometimes I reuse certain elements across multiple custom blocks for consistency in my design (e.g. icons and shapes made outside of Rise). I would love the ability to build my own asset/image library, where images I upload can be stored in a place where I can easily access them when clicking on the Image Upload feature. The image options would then be: Generate with AI, Content Library, Upload, and Asset Library. This would be easier than saving custom blocks with elements I need as a block template and wouldn't require me to upload the same graphic again and again. Hopefully others are interested in this as well!Working with AI content
Is it possible when creating an AI generated course in Rise that we have some more options? The Create AI course will create the course - but not change the provided content, other than to create the interactive activities. So allowing AI content to be developed external to Rise and then imported in. Create AI course, but split the imported documents into separate pages/section. This should minimise content being split between sections when it is only relevant to one page/section. Also this should allow a deeper dive into a subject when multiple sources are imported, currently a course seems to be a similar size regardless of 1 page being sourced or 10. Your current Create AI course option as it stands.
