Sharing folder in Rise

It is baffling that - three years on - this is still being requested. 

Articulate, we love Rise but your focus is at times questionable. Thousands of templates no one asked for, a release this week that caused serious issues and headaches for multiple users (only turned round in 24 hours because some of us shouted VERY loudly and threatened to cancel). 

We appreciate the design improvements, but when you've got 20+ users and 7,000 lessons like we have (and I'm sure many others have this and more!), why can you not see that Admin tools that improve workflow and sharing would be far more appreciated than a new heading design? Unless of course you're willing to add a new member of my team to all 7k lessons.

Decisions like this really do make me question our subscription. 

Can you please at least name a reason for ignoring this essential feature over years? That would help to decide if it's worth waiting for it or better switch to another platform 

It's hard to believe it's been 4 years since I wrote this post. Please take the voice of your customers seriously. It's clear a lot of us leaders in the business are lacking this critical functionality. 

Serioulsy, I'm with everyone on that one- it has been 4 years since we all started requesting that feature. it's not a "good-to-have' feature, its a mandatory one. We just hired someone new in our team, and now I need to go in all our +300 courses indivudually and add that peron to them... it's not viable. 

Why it has not been implemented yet?

You're still tracking requests?! People have been asking/begging for this for FOUR YEARS!

This is not a small feature request, this is a fundamental issue with sharing of projects within a  team, an issue that costs companies time and money in wasted hours.

Please don't be like Microsoft. This issue should be your #1 priority. 

Thanks, I did that yesterday :) 

Currently, we are using google drive to store final files (e.g. storyline sources) and have a process built around that. We cannot use that same processes with Rise. 

I understand we can add collaborators but the point is that if you have a big team (ours is about 20 developers), adding collaborators to every file is not efficient.

These are typical scenarios:

1. All developers need access to all in progress and final materials in case someone falls ill or is absent.  Or simply because another person is tasked with updating the content and not the original creator (and with a big team you can never know who it will be);

2. When you start translating content, the number of files gets even bigger and adding collaborators to specific files gets even harder. E.g. some of our courses are translated into 6 languages and when we update the English content we also need to update translations. We would like to be able to store final Rise files in a central place to which our developers and translation company would have access. This is where they would also add translated Rise files.

Any tips on how to make it more efficient are welcome! Thanks!

Would really love to see this feature as well. We need authors to be able to jump in and out of courses, so to be able to set this permission at the folder level would save those 'Argh' moments when you realize someone has forgotten to add you as a collaborator to a course. 

I've been following this thread for almost 2 years. It's really quite disappointing that a feature that has been requested by users for this long hasn't even made it into a roadmap. 

It is very frustrating that so many teams are requesting enhancements to Rise and there is no real response visible on the roadmap. This discussion was open over two years ago! Thanks all for your input and I hope Articulate Staff will treat it as their priority. 

Same here - we desperately need shared folders, or some other way to share files with "full access" other than adding individual team members one by one. It is indeed a nightmare, as already said in this thread. This thread is more than 2 years old - can we expect something to happen here soon, or should we rather look what the competitors offer?