Terminology for both desktops and tablets

Jul 09, 2013

I'm working on a Storyline project that users will be accessing both on desktop PCs and tablets. We're having some disagreement about navigational language, specifically, "Click Next to continue." Since tablet users don't have a mouse to click, this doesn't seem appropriate. On the other hand, "tap" doesn't work for mousers. One person had read something about using "select" as a generic term but to me "select" means choosing from several options and it's confusing to use it in another context.

I couldn't find any online resources addressing this issue. Has anyone here encountered this issue? How did you solve it? We've had WAY too much conversation on this point!

Thanks in advance for your help! 

13 Replies
Alexandros Anoyatis

Hi judy,

I usually choose to use a text variable in this scenario.

Something similar to "%select% here to do continue" usually does it.

I then insert a trigger or two to change the value of the 'select' variable to either "click" or "tap" depending on the device the module is being viewed from (usually done via JS).

Hope this helps,
Alex

Steve Flowers

I've seen arguments on the internet (yes, it does happen). In some UX circles, "Press" is the preferred term. I have taken on the habit to use select since this term could still apply to someone that doesn't have the faculties to press. Select still works in voice commands, etc.. I don't think our audiences care as much about the stuff we argue about as we do

Alexandros Anoyatis

Steve Flowers said:

I've seen arguments on the internet (yes, it does happen). In some UX circles, "Press" is the preferred term. I have taken on the habit to use select since this term could still apply to someone that doesn't have the faculties to press. Select still works in voice commands, etc.. I don't think our audiences care as much about the stuff we argue about as we do


+1

Alex

Tyson Priddle

It's an interesting discussion this one, and one I've thrown up on a few recent projects.

My goal on my next project is to review the need for any instructional text, by using clever design/instructional strategy - which makes it blatantly obvious what the next step is.

The context of this would obviously change, however for example do we really need to add "Click the forward arrow to continue"  if there is a great big forward arrow staring learners in the face? I'd like to give my learners a bit more credit...

Bruce Graham

As I often say to clients - I think out users understand what we mean a high % of the time.

These are people that will Pause a course, then go and maybe make a microwave lunch, call someone on their iPhone, and do some photocopying. They do not need instructions for any of those, (have you ever really read the instructions to a photocopier?).

As all of those are about x14 harder than navigating any of the courses we build, I think they'll be able to figure it out most of the time if we are as clear as we can be. Saying that, a clean set of instructions is always best, refer to "big arrows", or "numbered buttons" or whatever.

This discussion is closed. You can start a new discussion or contact Articulate Support.