Forum Discussion
How happy are we with feature request and bug handling at Articulate?
It would be great to get some community feedback on how happy people are with the Storyline360 product, especially when it comes to bug fixing and feature releases.
I've been getting more and more frustrated lately with the ridiculously slow resolution to bugs. It's not unusual to see forum posts outlining issues with the software, originally posted 2 years ago, and with posts days old reporting the same issue as part of the discussion.
I had a personal experience recently. I received an email informing me a bug had been resolved. I was excited, as I'd just reported a bug that month. However, on reading the email, it was a bug that had been reported 2 years ago.
Is 2 years an acceptable turnaround time for a bug to be resolved? In that time there had been multiple patches, updates etc. Some great enhancements, but they didn't see fit to fix a bug for a couple of years. I'd forgotten about it, and obviously been working around it subconsciously.
I think Storyline is a good product for certain tasks, but the transparency in regards to how issues and feature requests are handled isn't good. We as a community cannot see existing bugs that have been reported and accepted as bugs (not surprised if they are 2 years in the fixing) or how the feature requests are handled.
Do we need user group representation to apply more pressure to the people at Storyline making the decisions? I think the current process doesn't support the users of the software very well. The lack of transparency puts us in a position where we have to assume, "maybe I'm the only one who feels this way" when looking at some of the comments on the forum say otherwise.
Thanks for reading if you got this far, but would be great to hear from others what their experience has been (good & bad).
- KerryMunzStaff
Hi all,
First, by way of introduction, I’m Kerry Munz, CTO at Articulate. I joined Articulate in December 2022, and one of my first initiatives was a listening tour among our Engineers, Support Team, and other key internal stakeholders. A key takeaway from all those conversations was a need to bring Engineering closer to our customers. As engineers, we have a duty to know our customers and understand their challenges ourselves so that we directly experience the impact of our work and our choices.
Reading through this discussion, I hear the frustration and am saddened that you’ve lost faith in our communication, our quality, and are feeling abandoned. So, I would like the opportunity to listen and learn from you directly.
I’ll reach out to everyone who has posted in this discussion to schedule a group conversation to hear your concerns, ask and answer questions, and gather feedback from you on the changes we are making.
- KerryMunzStaff
Hey Team,
We put Storyline under a microscope based on your feedback and are making a number of changes to focus on quality first, transparency, and proactive communication. I appreciate all the feedback you shared and for giving me the opportunity to dive in and learn.
Please take a look at my update here about what we discovered and what we are changing. We'll be making monthly updates on the State of Storyline to keep you up to date.With deep appreciation,
Kerry. - ReubenHarper-69Community Member
The use of buttons (particularly the Storyline default buttons) and states is an example of code due for an overhaul. On the Articulate forums, I see many issues regarding the quirks new users experience when using buttons - e.g. hover appearing above selected state (logged 2014).
In a Jan 2023 tip from longtime staffer on how to combine hover and selected states the Bibby cut and paste button states technique (logged 2017) is demonstrated as a workaround to override default button behaviour, along with other ideas that users tend to figure out themselves over time (such as changing the appearance of hover to make it more subtle when it appears above other states).
Tidying up the default button behaviours to be more consistent and straightforward to program would lessen the random outcomes that new users complain about. I have several workarounds to the button issues and use whatever is required at the time, which often involves testing and editing until it works; if it simply worked consistently every time without looking for workarounds that would be an improvement. Users often create their own *.png buttons externally (in an image editing app such as Adobe Illustrator) then import, which I often do also for working around the look of default hovers without having to use extra triggers. I often do this because others may end up having to deal with these later when making future updates to my courses.
When I have logged tickets and provided files, the initial response has often felt like the representative responding is providing content from a how-to-guide rather than responding directly to the issue encountered. The improvement suggestions I have logged with Articulate result only in a vague and non-commital autoreply email in my inbox. Some fellow users I know have given up logging issues with Articulate, other than the occasional support ticket if they require assistance on workarounds that are not well documented on the forums already and have a tight deadline to meet.
- SamHillSuper Hero
Thanks for your comments on buttons Reuben. I couldn't agree more.
This is the kind of behaviour that we learn to live with (for the worse) and we are reminded frequently how ridiculous it is when explaining it to new developers or clients.
Another major bug bear of mine is that every element you add to stage has ALT text by default. Sure text boxes and jpgs, PNG's etc, but shapes drawn in Storyline and and icons imported through to stock library are sometime composed of grouped shapes where each element has a junk ALT text defined. This is extra unnecessary work as we must clear this stuff up for screen reader users.
- DanCalinescu-0bCommunity Member
I suspect they have only one dev that does all the work and the rest of the company are just sales people and managers.
- SamHillSuper Hero
Yes. I've made this comment myself before. Two+ years on bug resolution certainly gives the impression.
- WaltHamiltonSuper Hero
Here's my wish. i wish that whoever makes priority decisions for what gets coded would be forced to go through this forum, and read every post from the release of SL2 until today. Place every post in one of two categories: "How can I do ...?" and "This no longer works or doesn't work as it says it should". Leave out the feature requests entirely. You will find that before SL3, the vast majority of requests were for "How can I do this?" Since, the vast majority are for "This doesn't work (any more)." I think that should point the way very clearly to where coder's time should be focused. Once the app works, features can be added. I recognize that there are a lot of requests for features that are far more difficult to implement than they are worth, or if implemented can benefit only a small niche.
- KerryMunzStaff
Thanks for the suggestion Walt. I'm reading. And it is eye opening.
- JoeFrancisCommunity Member
Kerry,
You can't hardly be surprised that a message thread like this has started, much less drawn the amount of traffic from as many hard-core users of the tool as it has. A brief tour through Discuss > Articulate Storyline will yield many more examples of the topic of this thread. What IS surprising is there aren't MORE of these threads, either here or off-site.
Canned responses from Articulate's mouthpieces followed by...absolutely nothing...sooner or later tend to catch up with you. The standoffish attitude I have seen harkens back to the days of Adobe long before they bought their way into the eLearning development toolspace by swallowing up Macromedia. As a beta tester for Macromedia for a LONG time, and a charter member of the Authorware Inner Circle (a curated group of power users from outside the organization who contributed, skunkworks-style, to the NEXT version of Authorware) it was obvious how much Macromedia was invested in not only in gathering user feedback, but APPLYING that feedback to the product line, at a time well before company-hosted, web-based user communities. From the early-90s through the mid-2000s, there was no other game in town with the depth and breadth of Macromedia. It is thanks to their licensing Flash that you were even able to get your product off the ground. If more Macromedians and less Adobe-ians were running the show now, Storyline may well have never gotten the market position it has now.
- KerryMunzStaff
Hey Joseph. Appreciate the insight and history. I joined Articulate because of the incredible impact this whole community has on millions of learners everyday. I’ve personally taken many courses made by people in this community and they’ve helped me grow.
I hear the frustration.
Since I joined, I’ve been talking to a lot of happy customers and recognize from this and other threads, there is a lot of work to be done. Silence was never intended to be standoffish. But you are right, it is hard to interpret anything but apathy if you are feeling ignored. Message heard loud and clear.
- SamHillSuper Hero
Hi Kerry, good to see an Articulate rep on this thread.
As others have mentioned, this isn't a new problem and something we've been dealing with for years. I had a look through the forums recently just to look through examples of the frustrations I was feeling to make sure I wasn't alone. Nope, this has been going on for a long time. I've joked in the past that I think Articulate have one developer working on Storyline. It really does feel like that. I saw your email and am keen to meet and talk through some of the frustrations we feel with our interactions with support, such as the stock standard "That's a great suggestion, we recommend submitting a feature request". People stop doing that when they don't feel they are being listened to. Whether this is the case or not, it always feels that feature requests and bug reports are not publicly available for a reason. It means the users have less power to hold Articulate accountable.
For example, I can submit bug reports and feature requests and as an account holder, I have no record of those, other than an email response. In my account, I should be able to view the feature requests and bug reports I've submitted.
It would be to see publicly feature requests, so that users can give them an upvote, This is all done via the forums at the moment with people just chiming in with a "+1". It would be great to see some of these things make it in to the roadmap too.
Also, recognised bugs need to be available publicly listed so we don't waste time in the forums and can first review if a big has been acknowledged and when a patch is likely to be released so we can communicate this to clients.
I put a tongue in cheek video together recently to entertain myself and also illustrate a common experience on the forums. I hope you can appreciate the funny side to this, but also the bang your head against the table frustration too.
Look forward to catching up.
- MauraSullivan-9Community Member
Sam, Thanks for the video. I really enjoyed it and the music.
I too have come to the conclusion that requests for "features" are a waste of time because they're ignored.
As far as bugs go, I get emails every time someone posts to the forum. Whenever a bug is mentioned/acknowledged by multiple people including SL staff, I drag it to a separate Outlook folder (SL Bugs) so I can find it again.
One pet peeve of mine is when SL asks to take the issue offline. Other users no longer learn whether a bug was confirmed, or not.
At my company we never update to the latest release (always has too many bugs) and often wait 6 months or more to upgrade when the software is hopefully more stable.
- MathNotermans-9Community Member
It's sad but that advice is sound and most professional companies i worked for or with advice that too.
Nevertheless i am inclined to give both Articulate and Kerry the benefit of the doubt and let us see if they can improve on it.
I would be happy with 1 upgrade per half year or year if it was 100% bugfree and new features would be really properly tested and indeed improvements.
- MathNotermans-9Community Member
I completely agree with you. And 2 years is a short period of time in Articulate eyes im afraid. If you search the forum you find bugs that are around 10 years ! In my eyes thats unacceptable.
Especially when there have been updates and fixes on that specific part. - PeterMoore1Community Member
I also agree. Not only can bug fixes take inordinate amounts of time to be resolved but there is also an almost continuous procession of newly introduced bugs that thread their way into the product with the monthly updates. It can be a stressful experience working with Storyline!
- MathNotermans-9Community Member
Indeed companies i worked for...tell their employees... DO NOT update Articulate the moment you get an update announcement...as they donot test properly. We first want to test internally whether all functionality that we need is fine... we tell you all when an update is safe. And that was true in companies i worked in about 7 years ago !!!! This has not changed since.
- SamHillSuper Hero
Yes, always risky to update immediately and BETA test, which can sometimes be frustrating when you see a feature update you've been waiting for.
- SamHillSuper Hero
I did think of you as I wrote this. I wondered if you might pop-up.
I'd be happy if it was cool aid. It's mostly brine.