Reviewers able to skip in course questions?
Hello All, Like many of you, I have various reviewers assess course content via Learning 360. One of these is telling me that in a past job, their edesigner was able to set up the course in Review such that the testers could skip the in-course questions. Is that possible? I'm not seeing a setting for that, nor have my searches here turned up anything. Thank you!Review 360 Links Not Working on Laptop
Hi Team, Since Friday, 21st March, I’ve been experiencing an issue with Review 360 links on my laptop. Whenever I try to open a link, I am redirected to the sign-in page. However, after entering my credentials and clicking Sign In, the page keeps buffering indefinitely. This issue seems to be specific to my laptop—I can access my account without any problems on my tablet. Steps I’ve Already Tried: • Cleared browser cache • Reset browser settings • Tried different browsers and network connections Unfortunately, none of these steps have resolved the issue. Has anyone else faced a similar problem? If so, please let me know how you resolved it. Any guidance on fixing this would be greatly appreciated.Share Folders with Reviewers
I have several clients with several courses that I have uploaded to Review for SME comments and suggestions. However, I want to be able to allow the clients to access ALL the courses within a particular folder. So, instead of providing them course by course URLs, I want to provide them with a URL that brings them only to their folder. They can then choose which course to review and comment on. Also, every time I create a new course, I could drop it into the folder and not have to send them a new URL. One URL to rule them all so to speak... Up until now, I've only been able to figure out how to share individual course links. Is there a way I can get a single URL for the folder to send to the client? Thanks!Issue: Exporting New Version of Existing Review Link - Content Not Loading
We are experiencing a persistent issue when attempting to export a new version of an existing review link in Articulate Review 360. Upon initiating the export process, the system displays the message, "This item will be here automatically when ready." However, the updated content fails to load, rendering the new version inaccessible. Impact: This issue significantly hinders our workflow, as we require the ability to export updated versions of existing review links to incorporate feedback efficiently. Creating a new review link is not a viable solution due to the potential loss of valuable comments from previous reviews. Could you please help us find a good solution? ThanksRise will not properly import Storyline project
We have a storyline project imported into a Rise course using Review360. We've had a few recent reports from learners that they are stuck on the opening question and no matter what they put in is determined incorrect. I accessed the Rise course and took it myself, confirming the technical issue. I initially thought this was a problem in the Storyline project, perhaps how the Submit button was placed, however beforehand I checked the project in Review360 and this problem does not exist. It operates fine. I tried reimporting it to make sure they are the same version but this major discrepancy still exists. I'm working on accessing the project file as we speak, and I'll update if I discover any further information once I have it. But at the moment the variable appears to be between the Review version and the version once imported into Rise. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!New feature request : use of points and badges to an Articulate Rise base course lesson/chapter wise
Dear Articulate, For last several years, Articulate Rise become an eLearning Authoring tool with great features. Now this is the time we need some innovative feature elements added to it. Could you please add the below feature to the Rise tool: Add points and badges to a course Chapter-wise / by the users. The badges can be used by uploading to a course as customized ICONS as images the organization can use their own icons. This can be assigned to a chapter or lesson. Negative marks /points calculated as per user behaviour, such as number of quiz tries, scenarios, or interactive completion, can be added to the points. Let us know if anything in this direction is in the plan and how soon this can be added to the development plan. Best regards, SibaSeeking Insights on DOM Attribute Changes in Storyline 360 Versions 3.87 to 3.91
Hello Articulate Community, I'm currently examining the backend code changes between Storyline 360 versions 3.87 and 3.91, specifically focusing on Document Object Model (DOM) attribute modifications. For instance, I've observed that the data-reactid attribute has been replaced with data-id in the published output. Understanding these changes is crucial for maintaining the functionality of custom JavaScript code that interacts with Storyline's output. Could anyone provide insights or documentation on: The rationale behind these attribute changes. A comprehensive list of similar DOM modifications between these versions. Best practices for adapting custom scripts to accommodate these updates. Your expertise and any resources you can share would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!Date Picker
Hello All, I have searched high and low for a solution to adding a Date Picker Field to a Storyline 360 course. I found some discussions that are 9 years old and they all involve Web Objects. The only problem is I cannot figure out how to test a Web Object that is a Local html file in Review 360. There isnt a pure Java version of this I can find. I cannot believe this isnt a standard input for Storyline in all this time. Does anyone have a NEW solution to this that is not already out there?
