Articulate for Mac? Please!!!!!
Apr 03, 2012
Hello everyone, this has to have been asked hundreds of times, but those of us at large company's we are soon going to have to say goodbye to Articulate unless a MAC version comes out quickly! I know the standard response from Articulate is "we can't announce a launch time at this time", but what are we supposed to tell our company's that are dropping support of Windows? Last week I just purchased two competitors programs to test them out on our MACs. If everything goes well we're going to be forced to begin purchasing more licenses and switching from Articulate. Sorry, but Bootcamp/Windows isn't being supported by our IT dept anymore. And it just doesn't pay to purchase premium software and have to find work arounds to have it developed or viewed on non flash playing devises. Articulate.....step up! Many love the program, and don't want to switch, but we're being forced to. Someone give us a MAC implementation date.
111 Replies
I agree 100%
Excellent! Right on!
Hi James.
Thanks for your input. I can tell you that we, top to bottom, are all very well aware of this request as I mentioned in my previous post.
I asked my boss for a Macbook Pro this morning. Looks like I'll either be dual-booting or running that Parallels application ($99 / year?!). Or may just be forced to continue with Windows.
This thread is 3 years old and have to agree that this lack of platform is disappointing.
Some have said the parallels works fine. I find it to be just “okay.” It slows down my mac (mac book pro is new). If Articulate isn’t going to develop in for a mac platform, then perhaps some tutorials on how to best run Articulate on Mac with Parallels. I am just about to give up on Articulate.
Hi Jo,
We did recently updated our Support article here with some more information on working with Storyline in Parallels.
And just since it's on an earlier page, I did want to share a snippet from my colleague Justin's previous reply:
Hope that helps!
And what about the other Articulate applications, not storyline?
Hi Jo,
The directions for Studio and working in Parallels are here.
Does anyone know how the performance of Parallels compares to running Storyline off of a Windows machine via Remote Desktop like the Citrix client?
Hi Alexander,
I personally don't use Parallels but know a lot of users utilize Parallels or VMWare to access Windows and Storyline. You'll want to make sure you follow those best practices for working in the set ups mentioned.
For Storyline, Parallels / VMWare should run the same or faster on a Mac VM than through Remote Desktop for most operations. That's my experience so far with SL.
On a related note, I ran a comparison between a dedicated windows gaming laptop and the Mac VM for publish of a fairly large Story file. The windows laptop was slightly faster publishing. Didn't notice any difference in operating the tool.
You might see a slight improvement to publish speed on a dedicated RDC connection, depending on how beefy your machine is. Personally, I don't like using remote desktop for a long time due to the hiccups, occasional delays, and display artifacts (depending on the client used)
Parallels runs Windows pretty much the same as my dedicated Windows machines.
Parallels didn't work well for me. I need a Mac version pronto or I'm dropping storyline. I can't believe with all the request that you've made no attempt to develop a Mac version.
Hi Cindy.
I run Parallels without any issues. I run virtual Windows 7, 8, 8.1 and 10 environments. Here is a helpful article that outlines some best practices to do this. The success you have may be dependent on the amount of RAM you allocate to your Windows environment, the total available RAM you have on your mac and also the speed of your mac. I also run two windows machines and my virtual machines run our software the same, if not faster in some cases. If you are having specific technical issues with using the software, please feel free to reach out to our support team and we will be more than happy to help you out.
I had parallels and storyline wouldn't work correctly. I tried troubleshooting with you guys for weeks before giving up. I'm just saying that if you don't catch up to 2016 and get a Mac version then you're going to lose customers and miss out on new ones. It's been years. I'm not sure why this isn't a priority for your company.
Hi Cindy -
What kind of problems did you run into? I'm one of the folks that has been running SL since before version 1.0 was released on a Mac (VMWare Fusion) Windows 8 and now Windows 10 without any headaches. I have a MacBook Pro Retina but was also successful running SL1 on a pretty wimpy old MBA with WinXP.
I would love a native version but until that day it works great via parallels. As Steve asked what issues are you hitting may be able to help.
Hi Cindy.
I do see some older cases which may be yours. If you want to submit a new case and put ATTN: Justin W. the case will get escalated to me and I would be more than happy to try to help you get up and running.
I find it interesting that despite the years of pleading for a native mac version, the continued answers we get is “Parallels works fine.” While Parallels has not worked fine for me, that really is not the issue. The issue is the decision by Articulate not to support a native Mac version in spite of continued requests. Very disappointed that we keep getting patronized. I, for one, gave up some months ago.
Hi Jo.
I do understand your frustration. We are well aware of the feature requests. I am more than happy to work with you directly if you are having any technical issues with using our software in a Parallels environment.
Just noticed that this was a thread for Studio. Both Studio and Storyline use Windows frameworks for development. For Studio, there are very specific reasons that a Mac version might not be in the cards. Microsoft controls what can be accessed and automated to / from Powerpoint and Word. The lack of a Mac version of Studio is VERY likely due to an inability for *anyone* to integrate with Mac versions Powerpoint to the level needed for Studio to function. This could have changed recently but the older versions of Mac Office were significantly constrained.
For Storyline, while I would LOVE to see a Mac version, I'm not sure it's even in my top 10 wants / needs. Two code-bases ends up being a split in attention. Development slows and parity becomes a pain.
As mentioned by multiple folks in this thread, Parallels and VMWare Fusion both can be made to work and perform (for the most part) on par with equivalent hardware in a native Windows machine. Phil and I both produce pretty high volumes of complicated outputs without touching PC hardware. Happy to help work through issues you're having.
Hey from Chile!
Im a Graphic Designer.. always work with Mac ( not MAC ). Hoping to hear about a new development for it.
Hi Kurt,
Parallels is great way to run Articulate software on your Mac. But it appears that many folks have already suggested that. The only thing I'll add is to make sure you have at least 8GB's of RAM on the Mac. Parallels will slow up your machine if you're running anything less than 8GB's.
The other thing you could do is partition your Mac HD using Boot Camp, and then have a dedicated Mac and dedicated Windows side. The only downside of this, is it's a either or scenario. If you want to check something on the Mac side, you'll have log out of Windows and sign into Ma, and vice versa. That's why Parallels is probably the better option.
Hi Alexander,
I use Storyline 2 and Studio in the Microsoft Remote Desktop client with no issues. I recommend turning off Forward printing devices, and having the background change to black when logging in.
Just want to add my two cents: PLEASE make a Mac version. If that ever happens I will be able to toss Adobe Captivate (an abomination and world's worst program) into the trash.
Thanks
This discussion is closed. You can start a new discussion or contact Articulate Support.